ADVERTISEMENT

The Theft

It looks like the USU game theft could be meaningful. Right now we are at 5-4 and tied for 5th. If the Refs didn't steal the Utah State game we'd be 6-3 and tied for second with USU and SDSU. Behind Boise at 7-2. It would be a shame if we got screwed in the Tournament seeding due to Referee Incompetence. That game could also be the difference between CKK keeping his job or not depending on how the rest of the season plays out. The MWC should start spending more $$ on referees and getting some that can actually see.

Coaching scenario....thoughts?

Let's say that Odom got poached while Marion is still at UNLV as the OC.

Would you consider the him as the replacement for Odom as head coach?

Young, super intelligent black man who appears to be able to truly relate to the guys around. It also appears he has some serious connections.


Could be a serious home run until, hopefully, someone poaches him because we are continuing to grow and WIN as a program.

Thoughts?
  • Like
Reactions: Rebel_Luv

CORE..

Hate to be negative, but regardless of how the Rebs finish out.. We need a new coach.. Top two hires for me are Will Wade &… Bob Huggins.. I guess we are too PC for both..

But, I see a core with this group.. A backcourt of Thomas/Hicks & front court of Whaley/Cottrell, add in Hill applying for medical redshirt? That’s a strong roster to bulk & add some pieces, plus our incoming class.. We can compete!

Curious about the future, what we think?
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Billy-Ball NIL Concept

I've been thinking that NIL has not only thrown recruiting into new ground but it could be doing the same for coaching searches.

Traditionally, the best coach has been a mix of several characteristics. Manager, X-O gamer, Press Speaker, NCAA navigator, NANNY etc, etc. One of his main responsibilities, if not the main responsibility, is RECRUITING. Better players can make an average coach look way better than he is. With NIL, recruiting is becoming less and less his responsibility. In fact, it's gone from his biggest responsibility to one that is, to some degree at least, out of his hands.

Assumption: The University has $ 1 mil a year for a coach that can be supplemented an additional $ 1.5 mil a year by wealthy boosters. ( I don't have specifics but you can insert any amount you want for the argument)

Proposition: Wouldn't it be better to spend the $ 1 mil on the coach and take the doner $ 1.5 mil and put it up for NIL payments for a few more top flight players?

Now, before anyone has his head explode look a the chart below ( incomplete and a year old, but the best I could find and it serves it's purpose for this post) You need to pay $ 2.5 mil to get a coach paid in the top 50. But when you look at some of the coaches getting that type of cash there are at least 20 of them we would be threatening to run out of town. They were a flash in pan, got hired, and now they are coming back to earth but with a pile of cash. So, I propose we pay our coach @ 1 mil from school funds and pay our players as much as possible. If the coach leaves, who cares - we get another one for a mil. If a couple of players get better deals - so what - we can pay new ones.

The goal would be to have the best players we can afford with an OK coach - rather than O.K. players with a 50th ranked coach.

Just a thought.


  • Like
Reactions: dcut03
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT