ADVERTISEMENT

Board Member Responses

Why not just invite enough members to dissolve the MWC and pay zero exit fees??
I wish it were that easy. UNLV and AF may be able to get out and hope for an invite to the AAC but, the others have no place else to go. Those others won't vote for a dissolution. We are going to end up paying for our own exit fee is what I'm afraid of. I'm also afraid we will hear our school President say we don't have the money.

Board Member Responses

Why not just invite enough members to dissolve the MWC and pay zero exit fees??

Because they would legally have to pay them. There's a contract in place. The PAC would have to pay that.

Not to mention they don't want all of the MWC.

They just made the first few chops of the tree. Now waiting for gravity to do the rest.

Board Member Responses

Thing is if (and I stress if because I dont know) PAC and the four schools invited did this behind the scenes then there would be no way for the Regents to know or be prepared.

We are all under the assumption that UNLV was included in this decision by the PAC and the other 4 that were invited.

Remaing 2 PAC schools got a bundle of money.

They used some of that money to lure 4 schools by paying exit fees. Why only 4? Because a 5th or 6th school would have lead to increasing the exit fees. It was a way for MWC to protect itself from complete implosion.

It was a power move and the first move of many in the game.

This puts pressure on the remaining MWC schools to figure it out.

Of the remaining schools AF has the softest landing. They can easily jump to AAC to join Army and Navy.

MWC would now be down to 7 and no longer a conference.

PAC just got the domino's started.

There's talk of PAC courting Memphis and Tulane. But the PAC currently have no TV deal. AAC TV deal is worth 7 million. Why would either leave unless they could get a similiar deal?

I think the PAC hopes a couple more (like UNLV) come knocking and work out their own exit fees.

MWC conference could stand firm but the risk in that is UNLV and AF bolt when contract is up.

The smart move for MWC would be let anyone who wants to walk out for a lesser exit fee now. Take that money and court/merge with CUSA.

It's like free agency in sports. You can trade a disgruntled player for less than he's worth now, or get zero in return next year when he becomes a free agent.
Why not just invite enough members to dissolve the MWC and pay zero exit fees??
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Who is 3-0

He’s 3-0 and took a doormat program to the top 25 or near it. This morning there were unlv highlights on college game day.

The days of being invisible, are probably over. Heads are turning and unlv will have more eyeballs on the program. Whatever happens, Odom has shown it can be done.
It can work the other way too, in that great publicity for UNLV that exposes our programs in a positive light to other coaches.

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

Well we were almost to the end of our contract and more than likely with an intact membership like we had it would have been a lot more money with a new contract. Look what our basketball teams added to the NCAA tourney. Hell, we had 8 schools, 4 teams, shown on CBSSports for our 2nd round games back to back where we were the only conference on for 11 hours straight. Our football teams have been doing a lot better and we were the top G5 conference. Yes, our next contract would have been a lot better. Now, we are ****ed. Our 8 remaining schools will be looking at something comparable to Conference USA money. Somebody here mentioned $750k per team.

Yep...

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

You could be 100% correct. But Is CW going as high as 7 million when current MWC deal is only around 3 ? Is there that much more value in this conference and those teams?

I don't know.
Well we were almost to the end of our contract and more than likely with an intact membership like we had it would have been a lot more money with a new contract. Look what our basketball teams added to the NCAA tourney. Hell, we had 8 schools, 4 teams, shown on CBSSports for our 2nd round games back to back where we were the only conference on for 11 hours straight. Our football teams have been doing a lot better and we were the top G5 conference. Yes, our next contract would have been a lot better. Now, we are ****ed. Our 8 remaining schools will be looking at something comparable to Conference USA money. Somebody here mentioned $750k per team.

Board Member Responses

For what it is worth from Byron Brooks, it sounds like the quote of us turning it down due to Reno is false.

Thank you for your thoughtful email.

I believe it's important to note that UNLV has not been invited to the PAC 12, unless there has been some developing news that I am not aware of.

The Board has taken no action on this matter, as nothing has come before the Board. As with other campuses, if a campus decides to move conferences, it eventually comes before the board for a vote. The last time that happened was in February of this year when the College of Southern Nevada asked for a regional change for the baseball team. The board voted unanimously to approve it.

When the news came that four institutions were leaving for the PAC 12, I was quoted as saying that I believe the move to the conference (if invited) should be a package deal with the two institutions. My thought was that elevating both campuses would be great for our state.

I also said that I understand the market value of a UNLV invite, and I could see the attractiveness of an independent move. If UNLV gets an invite, it will come before the Board for a vote. The decision for a conference change does not rest with one Regent.

I hope I was able to provide some clarification to this, and I welcome continued dialogue with you.
While that may be true, he stated that the Board of Regents will vote on any move.

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

The PAC may have some guarantee with CW for a specific amount that may make it enticing. I don't know. I'm just thinking they may have something in place yet to be announced.

You could be 100% correct. But Is CW going as high as 7 million when current MWC deal is only around 3 ? Is there that much more value in this conference and those teams?

I don't know.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

Staying in the MWC is a stupid decision if our President and AD want to stay. That would be our death penalty. They need to be working on something to get us out. If we can get out with AF then that is what we should do. AAC would be a great spot for AF. Adds some travel for us but hopefully they pay enough to cover those expenses.

I wouldn't even oppose moving our Olympic sports to a West coast based conference and take our football team someplace else if we have to. I don't like that idea but, if travel is an issue along with the money then we do what we have to do.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Board Member Responses

Are they ever prepared? Remember that Charlie Foxtrot with that 🤡 Beard ! SMH

Thing is if (and I stress if because I dont know) PAC and the four schools invited did this behind the scenes then there would be no way for the Regents to know or be prepared.

We are all under the assumption that UNLV was included in this decision by the PAC and the other 4 that were invited.

Remaing 2 PAC schools got a bundle of money.

They used some of that money to lure 4 schools by paying exit fees. Why only 4? Because a 5th or 6th school would have lead to increasing the exit fees. It was a way for MWC to protect itself from complete implosion.

It was a power move and the first move of many in the game.

This puts pressure on the remaining MWC schools to figure it out.

Of the remaining schools AF has the softest landing. They can easily jump to AAC to join Army and Navy.

MWC would now be down to 7 and no longer a conference.

PAC just got the domino's started.

There's talk of PAC courting Memphis and Tulane. But the PAC currently have no TV deal. AAC TV deal is worth 7 million. Why would either leave unless they could get a similiar deal?

I think the PAC hopes a couple more (like UNLV) come knocking and work out their own exit fees.

MWC conference could stand firm but the risk in that is UNLV and AF bolt when contract is up.

The smart move for MWC would be let anyone who wants to walk out for a lesser exit fee now. Take that money and court/merge with CUSA.

It's like free agency in sports. You can trade a disgruntled player for less than he's worth now, or get zero in return next year when he becomes a free agent.

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

Depends on what the PAC is offering.
Like I said these decisions are not made without some level of good faith estimate. The PAC's TV partners, mainly the CW, have a good idea what each market could offer for the contract.
The MW 4 jumped because of a notable bump from the MW contract, and likely the estimated MW contract that we would have gotten of everything stayed the same.
How high could it go? Only the people who are making these decisions knows, but I can see it get above 7 mil.
Ha, we were thinking about the same things.

They have to have some idea what CW is offering to make it enticing. There was an article I had read, and now can't find, that thought it could be as high as $10 million. Those writing the article could be full of shit but, if they were right then that certainly makes it more attractive.

The MWC on the other hand will probably be getting about $1 million per team on the next contract negotiations but, that is if CBS and Fox still want anything to do with us.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

AAC teams currently get 7 million from media deal.

Why would they leave to join PAC who currently has no TV deal?
The PAC may have some guarantee with CW for a specific amount that may make it enticing. I don't know. I'm just thinking they may have something in place yet to be announced.

Whitfield and Harper You Have ONE Job Right Now.

AAC teams currently get 7 million from media deal.

Why would they leave to join PAC who currently has no TV deal?
Depends on what the PAC is offering.
Like I said these decisions are not made without some level of good faith estimate. The PAC's TV partners, mainly the CW, have a good idea what each market could offer for the contract.
The MW 4 jumped because of a notable bump from the MW contract, and likely the estimated MW contract that we would have gotten of everything stayed the same.
How high could it go? Only the people who are making these decisions knows, but I can see it get above 7 mil.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT