Live feed
MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees
- By Masked_rebel
- Rebel Football
- 196 Replies
1- yes, you split the basketball payouts and join a conference that actually wanted you.Sorry, and no offense, I know you drunken whore-mongerers tend to slur your posts.but your post makes no sense.
"They could've agreed with the split and then shared the payout all members would've received" What? What payout? The $65 from the traitors that we only got when we sued? The $100M Rose Bowl contract money - Payable to the Pac-12 Conference? Hey - no conference, no money. That's why the reverse merger was the only logical course. The only thing that would have been to distribute is future NCAA BB credits, which I believe would have been distributed to all former members if the Conference disbanded.
And, even if there was "payout", are you saying that the Pac-2 should have shared OUR money with the WAC, beyond a modest entry fee? Or in case of the reverse merger, shared what become our windfall with MW schools? Why would we do that? Our mere presence, like it or not, would have been good for the entire conference. Mighta even kept the LV or Holiday Bowl.
And finally, F-yeah we wanted that ton of money. Would you walk away from it?
2. shared money- no, you got your payday after being left out, you accept reality and join the MWC pay the entry fee of 18 million or whatever it is and we go get a kick ass TV media deal that pays 15 million a year as the best G5 conference in all sports.
No, but I also wouldnt come crying foul play and saying you were forced into signing an agreement that forces you to pay a penalty if you try and tear the conference apart that helps you out... How much market value were you willing to shed to play in CUSA or WAC for 2 years to avoid paying a penalty should you poach the conference that said "sure, we can schedule you, it helps us both"...
MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees
- By Loyal Coug1
- Rebel Football
- 196 Replies
Sorry, and no offense, I know you drunken whore-mongerers tend to slur your posts.
but your post makes no sense."They could've agreed with the split and then shared the payout all members would've received" What? What payout? The $65 from the traitors that we only got when we sued? The $100M Rose Bowl contract money - Payable to the Pac-12 Conference? Hey - no conference, no money. That's why the reverse merger was the only logical course. The only thing that would have been to distribute is future NCAA BB credits, which I believe would have been distributed to all former members if the Conference disbanded.
And, even if there was "payout", are you saying that the Pac-2 should have shared OUR money with the
And finally, F-yeah we wanted that ton of money. Would you walk away from it?