The point is this. There are so many minds that are simple to manipulate - we’ve witnessed the ease these past two years. But what’s worse is authority choosing to take advantage of it through non-stop messaging and propaganda.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The point is this. There are so many minds that are simple to manipulate - we’ve witnessed the ease these past two years. But what’s worse is authority choosing to take advantage of it through non-stop messaging and propaganda.
A little demo of the info control/propaganda … each “medical professional” with the same exact tweet.
Maybe they are all working in the same exact hospital at the same exact time and they have the same exact thing to say.
Wake up people.
View attachment 82
They won’t pay.At least the courts stopped the BS at UNLV where they were forcing everyone to get the vaccine to go to school (my son will start next fall). I wonder how they will pay back damages to those who already got forced to get a vaccine for the fall semester at UNLV and had medical expenses due to adverse reactions? Maybe the staff and President at UNLV along with the board of regents should pony up the money out of their own pockets? Fat chance that will happen!
So many people are going to be on the most heinous side of history that we will witness in our lifetime.
Yeah … it’s awful. But let’s save grandma. Murder the kids, give grandma who is already past her life expectancy a few extra weeks because we, as adults, are scared.
The decision should be easy.Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines ‘Dramatically Increase’ Heart Attack Risk, Renowned Cardiologist Warns
In an analysis presented during a meeting of the American Heart Association, Dr. Steven Gundry, a pioneer in infant heart transplant surgery, said mRNA COVID vaccines put many patients at higher risk of a new acute coronary syndrome, such as a heart attack.childrenshealthdefense.org
I would trust the doctors that say this vax is safe, that side effects are rare, that there are no expected long term problems with the vax … instead of other experts and actual data.
The more you know, the better the decision you can make.
Myself, compounding the issues with jab upon jab is not for me.
“Put out the data in clear language and let the people decide themselves.”The decision should be easy.
Decide if you want the jab based risk/benefit for your age group and general health.
The problem is this data is extremely hard to get.
For me people over 65 and people who are already sick from a variety of illnesses should be getting jabs. Healthy people under 30 should almost never get the jab - especially males. All people in between should only get the jab if the have compromises to their immunity.
When we were told the jab would prevent people from spreading the disease you could responsibly take a position that jabs should be required for people who interact with the public. But now it is clear that the jab doesn't prevent the spread of the disease or it doesn't prevent getting the disease. Therefore, the decision should be based solely on if you think reducing the affects of getting the disease is better for you than the risk you take from the jab.
I’m all for this plan, too. Even if they don’t reveal information clearly, at least you should have the choice.The decision should be easy.
Decide if you want the jab based risk/benefit for your age group and general health.
The problem is this data is extremely hard to get.
For me people over 65 and people who are already sick from a variety of illnesses should be getting jabs. Healthy people under 30 should almost never get the jab - especially males. All people in between should only get the jab if the have compromises to their immunity.
Put out the data in clear language and let the people decide themselves.
When we were told the jab would prevent people from spreading the disease you could responsibly take a position that jabs should be required for people who interact with the public. But now it is clear that the jab doesn't prevent the spread of the disease or it doesn't prevent getting the disease. Therefore, the decision should be based solely on if you think reducing the affects of getting the disease is better for you than the risk you take from the jab.
And let’s not forget the very dominant, hammering home narrative before they balked and then walked back. Such conviction in the original statements. This was sold to one and all. This didn’t happen with only this guy, it happened with all of them, including fauxi, wallenski, the president …. Everyone. This is what they emphatically sold without hesitation.
I believe people should be angry at the proper targets. They lied, right to your face, non stop.
Nah, you hit the nail on the head. What has been ignored for so long (masking not working, vax not working well, business lockdowns, etc) has become far too strong for them to ignore. Yes, they’ve smeared, altered data, and done uncountable unsavory things to craft their narrative … NY is a tremendous example. But there have been examples elsewhere and more and more will pop up.
And there it is folks the waving of the white flag...
To be clear, I actually think President Biden is a good, honorable man.
He's also a life long politician with nothing in his history that suggested he was going to be some unifying force or a particularly effective leader.
This simple quote says a lot. (In no particular order of relevance)
1) That he and his administration know that his federal mandates will be embroiled in court battles.
2). That there is no 'answer' to Covid. Not masks, not mandates, not lockdowns. Even the vaccines are proving some what ineffective. (Vs spread not symptoms).
His administration can clearly see that fatigue has set in for a lot of people. That continued mandates are becoming increasingly unpopular.
He's punting.
He (and his administration) are putting it on States and governors to deal with it.
Let them take the brunt of the fallout.
This is the result of making cases the metric.
When New York, who has some of the strictest mandates out there, is churning out a ridiculous number of daily cases, it's clear (at least to me) that this is a washing of the hand on some level..
The vaccines and boosters failed at mitigating spread. They put all their eggs in that basket.
Cases should never have been a metric and this administration is starting to feel the blowback.
That's my 2 cents. But what do I know, I barely graduated high school.
He … won’t admit it. None of them will. They took the bs hook, line, and sinker … didn’t question anything, just went along … for some I understand it … for others? Nope. You should have known better.
@lvhiker
I am old enough to remember being told any old face covering worked.
Especially during Delta...
This is some Orwellian level revisionism from people that were at the forefront of messaging.. And touting the efficacy of masks...
When Trump was in office, cases were emphasized because “cases bad”. Now they want to drop cases because those same cases make the vax look bad. It’s controlling the narrative.Funny hot the fake media and social fake media both are screaming about the number of people getting sick, but totally ignoring the fact that the number of those being hospitalized or dying is still plummeting!
Funny hot the fake media and social fake media both are screaming about the number of people getting sick, but totally ignoring the fact that the number of those being hospitalized or dying is still plummeting!
The walking back … I don’t know that I trust it … I feel like it’s a ploy.I think initially this was the case. It's slowed down in that regard.
You're seeing more honesty of late.
Notable talking heads who were very concerned about cases a year ago, are now preaching that we should focus more on hospitalization...
Not saying there still isn't an over reporting on cases, but I think it's been tempered some.
I don't think there is any question that MSNBC, CNN and Fox are more political propaganda outlets than news outlets at this point.
It's not hard to dig up old tweets and quotes from these people that have done complete 180s...
No, no propaganda, no lies, no coercion here. This is about the alarming number of peds admits because of omicron, the bullshit numbers that are circulating.
The walking back … I don’t know that I trust it … I feel like it’s a ploy.
If it’s not, they wasted so much time and did so much damage, there’s no absolution in admitting a mistake of this stature after this period of time. It’s wholly unforgivable.
The “whys” could be just about anything. But a lot of people are going to make themselves scarce. Or they’ll try to smooth things over and backtrack and make it seem like their original truth was misconstrued (hell, go back to the Menzies hire … (by some, same types) he was a good hire until he was fired, then it was admitted he sucked and then it was “I never said he was a good coach”. The can’t ever be wrong syndrome.
Can anybody tell me which part of the science I'm supposed to trust.
The first part?
Or.
The walk back?
I'm confused.
@j. spilotro
So in the last week the following things have been debunked. Or are seriously in question.
1) Efficacy of masks (Outside of N95)
2) Efficacy of vaccines to mitigate spread.
3) Efficacy of vaccines vs variants.
4) Necessity of 10 day quarantine. (There have been numerous articles over the last year saying this was unneccessary)
5) An article by the NY Times with actual doctors and virologists stating too many boosters may actually be harmful and make spread more likely. There's no way that article sees the light of day a year ago. It would have been considered misinformation.
Go look up some of the more pro mask/vaccine/booster and people who fretted over cases on social media.
There has been, if not a complete 180 a definite shift on a number of those issues.
I honestly think some of it is political.
1) There is definitely Covid fatigue among people.
2) Lockdowns/mandates are becoming increasingly unpopular.
Political shills who months ago pearl clutched over cases are now saying it's a bad metric.