ADVERTISEMENT

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

Looking at AAC GOR...

Not sure how reasonable a price any of them would be.

Plus if PAC had the money to get them they would have now no?

PAC will pay the exit fees. Poaching fees? We'll see.

If they lose the poaching fees case it's a huge bite out of that 'war chest' limiting their options further.
They're not spending the war chest. Its earmarked for OSU and WSU to pay debts. Its why they're fighting so hard against both sets of fees. Its also why they wrote into the contract that they have veto power and control over finances.

Craig Smith available

Not only no on Craig Smith but hell no! He wont he able to bring in the players to UNLV to be a top 1-2 in the conference. I guess if being a middle of the conference team is acceptable then he would be a good candidate. But at that point is that much of an approvment over Kevin?
Harper needs to bring in someone that attracts attention and has proven they can win and bring in talent
could he have won more with Kruger's roster?

Craig Smith available

Not only no on Craig Smith but hell no! He wont he able to bring in the players to UNLV to be a top 1-2 in the conference. I guess if being a middle of the conference team is acceptable then he would be a good candidate. But at that point is that much of an approvment over Kevin?
Harper needs to bring in someone that attracts attention and has proven they can win and bring in talent
  • Like
Reactions: brentjg

DJ OUT INDEFINITELY

Who in tf thought he was one and done? I thought at best, he would be fringe and that usually is really healthy for a college program because you should get at least 3 out of them.

I think he’s a good PG, I think he’s the best player on our team, but nowhere close to NBA right now.

and, tbh, it seems like he’s tapered off. I won’t say regressed. His clutch time performance was hit and miss last year, more miss this year.

That said, he will test the NBA waters, then when that doesn’t go as he hopes, he will go to the highest bidder, which won’t be UNLV.

A quality PG (he is that) that’s a JR within two years left will draw a lot of attention.

If he were on a team with a reliable wing (shooter that could do more than just shoot) and a solid post big man … to the point where he’s third or fourth scoring option … you have a pretty good team. But we put everything on his shoulders. That’s shortsighted, it was a huge error in the construction of the roster, imo.
I wasn’t around here much of the DJ recruitment cycle but on the conference board I was at, there was talk among rebel fans that DJ was going to be one and done if he signed with unlv.

In hindsight that’s ludicrous but unlv fans have always had high hopes and expectations for recruits, imo. What’s real strange is the recruiting after signing DJ really fell off a map. CKK surrounded him with a bunch of jags and DJ isn’t the type to carry a program. As you say, huge error in roster construction.

Craig Smith available

I mentioned Craig long ago that he might be canned and he will get a buyout. Which makes him a candidate to be a good coach that can be hired on our budget.

65 percent winning percentage in his career and lots of experience in comparison to CKK to be an upgrade.

We could do worse (CKK, Menzies) but I think there are better options Harper will pursue. If Craig was hired, I would be fine with it especially if he can put together a good staff.

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

They will tank SOS, they will command a share of the CFP payouts (costing each school another 300k) and they do nothing positive and have a very low ceiling. Not worth it. Especially if they are also adding Texas State.
Agree to add a Texas AAC school or 2 now, play 2 conference years with a lean 8 schools, then get much better options down the road at a reasonable price. Finding an extra OOC game for a couple of years is worth the headache, than adding a bottom feeder that is a detriment to conference is practically every way.

Looking at AAC GOR...

Not sure how reasonable a price any of them would be.

Plus if PAC had the money to get them they would have now no?

PAC will pay the exit fees. Poaching fees? We'll see.

If they lose the poaching fees case it's a huge bite out of that 'war chest' limiting their options further.

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

But adding them football only, at almost nothing price tag fixes a ton of scheduling headaches. 5 OOC games is a logistics nightmare.
They will tank SOS, they will command a share of the CFP payouts (costing each school another 300k) and they do nothing positive and have a very low ceiling. Not worth it. Especially if they are also adding Texas State.
Agree to add a Texas AAC school or 2 now, play 2 conference years with a lean 8 schools, then get much better options down the road at a reasonable price. Finding an extra OOC game for a couple of years is worth the headache, than adding a bottom feeder that is a detriment to conference is practically every way.

Fresno St holds out players; Sources Confirm Betting Inquiry

I'm not talking book smart I mean common sense smart. Like don't drive your car 100mph while high on drugs. Or don't bet on games in which you are playing.
Was never talking book smart. Many of these guys are just stupid, and can't even find their own ass, but have always been praised because of their athletics!

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

Pac has no interest in NMSU. Theres a reason why the MWC also didnt kick those tires. Its not a university that is committed to spending money and building their brands. They dont have it. They dont have the NIL opportunities to be competitive. The PAC is trying to build itself as a psuedo P5 conference brand and adding NMSU drags it down. The whole point of leaving the MWC was to avoid programs that are bloating the conference and not investing in their programs. So no

Trust me I get NMSU is a horrible option.

But adding them football only, at almost nothing price tag fixes a ton of scheduling headaches. 5 OOC games is a logistics nightmare.
  • Like
Reactions: RebelinWA

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

I get where you are coming from here. Adding NMSU will lower their strength of schedule on top of diluting their overall media value. But at the same time, its already difficult to schedule OOC. It would be a step up from having to add an extra FCS game.

Admittedly this will be difficult now; but they might be able to pencil in some kind of agreement with the MW to trade a set number of games per season. It might be easier once tensions come down a bit in a couple of years.
They should target UTSA and UNT. I think there is a window there, it would be more expensive, but worth it. The problem there is the 27 month rule that the AAC has, they may be worth a phase 2 addition to save money down the road. Add Rice to that list too as better options than NMSU.

You can't have more than one FCS team on their schedule without it starting to count against you, so that isn't an option.

I am guessing the Pac 2 has an unspoken agreement to not schedule with former PAC 12 members, but they are running out of options. I am sure some of those schools would not mind given their travel schedule in conference can get hairy,

Then there are the traditional rivalries. Does Wyoming stop playing CSU? OSU and WAZZU are still playing their old PAC rivals.

But NMSU is a bad, bad choice. They are easy for a reason. Sam Houston is a better option, but it may be worth waiting on a texas AAC school for a few years for expansion sake.

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

I get where you are coming from here. Adding NMSU will lower their strength of schedule on top of diluting their overall media value. But at the same time, its already difficult to schedule OOC. It would be a step up from having to add an extra FCS game.

Admittedly this will be difficult now; but they might be able to pencil in some kind of agreement with the MW to trade a set number of games per season. It might be easier once tensions come down a bit in a couple of years.
I'm guessing there isnt a chance in Hell that this happens. Both will want compensation that neither will be willing to pay each other. Blood will continue to be bad, especially if the PAC continues to trash the MWC programs in the same way they have been doing. Add in the financial payouts from lawsuits and scheduling... Especially Boise, itd be great to take a shot at each G5s top school, but theyre going to be scheduling a P4, and a bunch of soft G5s and live off SOS from a conference they hope supports it.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

NEXT PAC MEMBERS

I say no on NMSU.

Scheduling an extra OOC game is probably worth it vs giving them any share of the PAC deal. They would likely have to give them an equal CFP share too, being a football member. Though I would imagine the PAC will not be able to schedule with a MW all that easily, and vice versa, so that does make things a bit more difficult.

NMSU does nothing for them other than being a "warm body" of sorts. Very little potential in the future. Might as well go for Sam Houston over NMSU, they have been more relevant in football and has much more potential.
I get where you are coming from here. Adding NMSU will lower their strength of schedule on top of diluting their overall media value. But at the same time, its already difficult to schedule OOC. It would be a step up from having to add an extra FCS game.

Admittedly this will be difficult now; but they might be able to pencil in some kind of agreement with the MW to trade a set number of games per season. It might be easier once tensions come down a bit in a couple of years.

Fresno St holds out players; Sources Confirm Betting Inquiry

Just to add some specifics:

"guards Jalen Weaver and Zaon Collins are alleged to have placed bets on games in which they participated, specifically wagering that the Bulldogs would fall short of their projected points and rebounds totals. "

But I am sure they gave it a 100% effort.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT