It's all G5....
- By Masked_rebel
- Rebel Football
- 92 Replies
This is where perception and reality mix...How?
Look at current MWC/PAC lineup.
Exclude UNLV and Boise State.
Every single coaching job is available. Pays the same everywhere.
Start listing the most attractive jobs and where you think you would have the best opportunity to win immediately and tell me how far down the list you get before you reach a MWC school.
Second point if UNLV and Boise had similiar OOC schedules and the results were the same. And then both ran the table in their respective conferences there is no way in any universe UNLV gets the nod over Boise State.
I just can't see it.
I'd take
Fresno, SDSU, CSU, OSU, WSU jobs before any MWC job.
I have to get all the way down to USU job before I might consider taking a MWC job.
In all likelihood the PAC media deal will be 3-5 million more per year than the MWC deal (possibly more) They took some of the largest markets and historically best programs in the conference. That alone over a three to 5 year period gives them an edge over MWC schools going forward.
We've had recent success and we're pointed in a good direction, but let's not pretend SDSU and Fresno's runs are ancient history and they can't bounce back. USU was bowl eligible pretty regularly. CSU won a bunch of games this year. WSU was bowl eligible this year.
CSU had 1 good season under McElwain, was then 7-6 3 straight seasons and has been a mid-tier to bottom tier MWC team since. Historically, We'd look at them and go "sure would be nice to go bowling" but its not like they're a powerhouse some people are giving them credit for. Frankly outside Boise, every other MWC program has a similar pedigree, with ours coming more recently. Most have 1 era where they win an average amount of games, make a few bowls, maybe have 1 good season and then drop off the map. Fresno has had a little bit more longer sustained success with solid hires after Hill, but SDSU was terrible outside a season with Brady Hoke and a handful of seasons under Rocky Long. Utah St has had really bad years and some decent seasons, and then in between a mixed bag of results. That's pretty much true of WSU and OSU as well.
So our success is recent yes, but we are making huge investments in the program to hopefully sustain the winning that our "flash in the pan" seasons created. These other schools were not able to do so and WSU will probably regress back into this similar cycle, especially with their former coach absolutely torching the programs perception since departing for WF... Outside maybe Utah St. hiring Bronco which might make Boise a little worried starting in 2026, every program across both conferences have failed to parlay their success into anything more than a few good seasons here and there in between some bad ones. And dont argue "attendance and markets.." there are definitely better places as college towns that encourages attendance even with bad teams than Las Vegas Im looking at records and perceptions. that's why the whole "Pac 12 is better then the MWC" argument is ridiculous because each side is projecting strength through mediocrity with 1 brand carrying the flag for each...
******basketball is a different conversation- not relevant to football conversation*****