ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone else pulling for Boise next week?

Hell yes, win the whole thing!
  • It would bring in money, exposure, conversation on G5 teams…. Possibly a UNLV name drop with coverage.
  • It’s really an easy business decision to pull for them.
What your ego wants is another thing.

Can't do it.


They and the rest of the 'PAC' will view it as lending credibility to their new conference. It won't mean squat for the MWC schools. The 'PAC' will use it as fodder to sell to media partners in an attempt to strengthen their media package.

Broadcast is just as likely to bring up Boise becoming a member of the new PAC as they are discussing anything about the MWC.

New OL coach?

Yeah our O line wasn’t exactly our biggest strength I would rather our kicker and some of our defensive players if given a choice but stability is good in any event.
I thought our offensive line was pretty solid. Wore teams down especially in the run game. They completely broke SJSU in the 4th quarter.

A lot of their sacks allowed were probably unfair to hold against them as hajj didn’t have the ability to throw the ball away and give up terrible sacks.

Got a Quarterback

In the link you provided, under where all the sorting options are, theres “on3 industry”, “on3 ranking” and “industry comparison” if you click “on3 ranking” it will show you the on3 rankings without taking other companies rankings into the equation. At this moment he’s a 90 overall 4 star according to on3 scouts.
I see what you are saying. They took their On3 ranking and added it to the 247 ranking and divided by two and they modified their original ranking to give him the 3 stars. That seems to make for a fair ranking. I like that they do that.

Got a Quarterback

Not sure what you are looking at from the link I provided. Where are the 4 stars you speak of on this kid. They only show 3 stars.

I know about the other rankings and yes, I knew they were worse. But, people were talking about On3 so I was staying on context.
In the link you provided, under where all the sorting options are, theres “on3 industry”, “on3 ranking” and “industry comparison” if you click “on3 ranking” it will show you the on3 rankings without taking other companies rankings into the equation. At this moment he’s a 90 overall 4 star according to on3 scouts.

Got a Quarterback

His schedule at Virginia was brutal.

Just his last 6 games went:

11/23, #13 SMU (L)
11/16, @ #8 Notre Dame (L)
11/9, @ #18 Pitt (W)
10/26, UNC (6-6 team) (L)
10/19, @ #10 Clemson (L)
10/12, Louisville (8-4 team) (L)

Yes, he lost all of those games, except 1. Yes he threw a lot of interceptions (13 TD to 11 Int). But he was also behind an O line that was shorter and lighter than UNLV's. He ate 39 sacks, which is 2 less than the 41 UNLV had this season. Except UNLV played 2 more games. I'll give him a chance. Behind a better O line, he'll make the plays we need. That being said, Mullen is far from done. We need 2 more.

Got a Quarterback

Not sure what you are looking at from the link I provided. Where are the 4 stars you speak of on this kid. They only show 3 stars.

I know about the other rankings and yes, I knew they were worse. But, people were talking about On3 so I was staying on context.
ON3 did have him as 4* a couple of days ago. Magic comes to UNLV and drops to 3*, what is new?
  • Like
Reactions: RRebel

Got a Quarterback

So on3 has him as 4 star 91 ovr, they have him as the 3rd best qb and 25th best transfer. You’re looking at the composite ranking from all services. 247 doesnt think as highly of him as on3 does. The composite has him at 30th qb and 315 in the portal.
Not sure what you are looking at from the link I provided. Where are the 4 stars you speak of on this kid. They only show 3 stars.

I know about the other rankings and yes, I knew they were worse. But, people were talking about On3 so I was staying on context.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT