ADVERTISEMENT

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

True, but if all the games are blowouts except when heavyweights play each other, viewership will suffer. Also, all the sports channels need inventory of games to show. At some point, if showing pickeball or kickball beats out some non power conference hoop viewership, those games will not be shown.

Everyone knows the sport has been going downward for a long time. That the big teams are killing their own sport does not seem to connect with them. This ncaa tourney was boring in my opinion with few Cinderellas.

Having your team be a farm team for p4 is no fun.
Exactly why I am losing interest. It's all becoming a minor league farming system for the top 10 programs.

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

It may make a dent in total viewership, but maybe not as much as you think.

The money schools all have the largest followings. It’d be nice to see a breakdown of what eyeballs are on games. With UCSB not making the tournament, you aren’t losing eyes, sadly, even for UNLV, how many are you going to lose.

So I’m not sold on it making this huge impact to total viewership.

There’s a reason some teams have a high total NIL package. It’s the ones with the highest viewership.
True, but if all the games are blowouts except when heavyweights play each other, viewership will suffer. Also, all the sports channels need inventory of games to show. At some point, if showing pickeball or kickball beats out some non power conference hoop viewership, those games will not be shown.

Everyone knows the sport has been going downward for a long time. That the big teams are killing their own sport does not seem to connect with them. This ncaa tourney was boring in my opinion with few Cinderellas.

Having your team be a farm team for p4 is no fun.

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

Over the past 20 years the NCAA football champion has been swapped among 11 programs. It remains extremely popular. The last "outlier" was BYU in 1984 out of the WAC. In the same 20 years the NCAA BB Champion has split between 10 programs. All NIL will do is solidify this and it won't impact National popularity. IMO ( and I don't want to research the facts ) unlimited NIL will make it more apparent that lower level programs have zero chance at a NATTY. It will reduce the popularity of the NON- IMPACT programs in favor of the continuous winners.

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

I believe the decision to spend "whatever is necessary" is only partially economic. Booster ego has a lot to do with how much NIL is available. But I think this is limited to maybe 10 programs. The rest will have to weigh economics heavier into the picture.

Right now European soccer leagues are generally not salary capped. The result it the top teams usually win year after year. (although there are upsets occasionally) I expect the same for NCAA BB with the winner being from 10-15 teams every year.
Financial Fair Play rules are supposed to blunt a little bit of that advantage, but you get teams like Man City and Chelsea that flaunt the rules and just ignore investigations and nothing happens, and they get so mad that they punish Everton and Nottingham Forest hard for lesser infractions.

Shit, european football is just like the NCAA haha!

Your point stands though in the each of the big European league in the last 25 years, only one time in the last 25 years has a non-traditional power team hoisted a cup (Leicester City in EFL, Montpellier in L1, Napoli in Serie A, Boavista in Primeira). The Bundesliga had 2 (Stuttgart and Wolfsburg), and La Liga had none though La Coruna won it 26 years ago). However all but one of those wins have come since the establishment of FFP.
  • Like
Reactions: InZoneU

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

I believe the decision to spend "whatever is necessary" is only partially economic. Booster ego has a lot to do with how much NIL is available. But I think this is limited to maybe 10 programs. The rest will have to weigh economics heavier into the picture.

Right now European soccer leagues are generally not salary capped. The result it the top teams usually win year after year. (although there are upsets occasionally) I expect the same for NCAA BB with the winner being from 10-15 teams every year.
If this keeps on happening every year with only the top teams winning which i suspect it will i can see a HUGE decline in viewership in CBB. Nobody wants to watch a fixed game. I still dont see the longevity of paying these players $$$ with little or no return?? Makes no sense. I thought when this first happened these kids would get MAYBE 100-200 k each not 20x times or more.

These schools lower P4 will see NIL money dry up also. No way anybody in their right mind and i know there are some real FANATICS out there for almost every school that they throw away millions every year to try and compete with the elites.

Kentucky NIL budget, allegedly

Wow, they are spending $1.5m and $1m for bench guys. This is crazy for a sport where attendance overall has been going down for years.
I believe the decision to spend "whatever is necessary" is only partially economic. Booster ego has a lot to do with how much NIL is available. But I think this is limited to maybe 10 programs. The rest will have to weigh economics heavier into the picture.

Right now European soccer leagues are generally not salary capped. The result it the top teams usually win year after year. (although there are upsets occasionally) I expect the same for NCAA BB with the winner being from 10-15 teams every year.

OT: The Last of Us

Your Friends and Neighbors on Apple is fantastic.
Adolescence on Netflix is the best show I've seen in a long time.
Your Friends and Neighbors is hilarious but John Hamm is good in everything he does. If you haven't seen the movie Confess Fletch (the same character Chevy Chase played) I recommend it highly very funny and Hamm is great in the role.
  • Like
Reactions: InZoneU
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT