Tickets/Interest
- By LVRebel2000
- Rebel Confidential
- 18 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Well since we (WAZZUWATCH) haven't had an Admin or moderator for years, I doubt that. The last Admin we had banned me 5-6 years ago for some unseemly posts towards another poster (he got banned too) so I lurked around for years and then reinvented myself as Loyal Coug1.Maybe they banned me from the last time I was snooping around, who knows?
The PAC TV deal for 2026 is not even in place, nobody has any idea what that equates to 2 years down the road. Where is the $10MM coming from?
All the P12 is, is a brand name. I mean I get what you're saying, but it's not as strong nationally as you think. We all know most of the rest of the USA thought the previous P12 was ass already and now it has a bunch of MWC and AAC teams with Wazzu and Oregon State? Meh.
There is also no reasonable assumption UNLV's going to stick it out in the MWC.
There are so many "what if" scenarios right now, who really knows. I guess if it came down to it, the PAC could add 2 crappy schools if needed, just to get to 8 teams. Then, once the new MWC media agreement gets worked out, with teams getting less money, I would think that the MWC would amend the exit fees, as they're not in line with the amount of money that the conference is bringing in, then teams could bounce after that.I feel like I'm watching a rerun of Get Smart. Question is, who is Maxwell Smart and who is Agent 99? Gloria or Teresa?
Of course Teresa wanted to keep The Pac alive - otherwise she would have been knocking on Gloria's door begging for a job in 2 years. We still need to know what the Pac offered in terms of help with the exit fees. This notion of UNLV (and maybe AF and/or Wyoming?) hanging around to collect poaching fees and an increased share of conference revenue (withholdings from your Traitorous 4) then bolting later brings some intrigue to all of this. The TBD "exit fees" for Memphis/Tulane or whoever from the AAC adds to the intrigue.
So here's my "maybe" scenario: UNLV (and maybe the afore-mentioned AF and/or Wyoming or SJSU or even USU) have a secret handshake deal to join the Pac after they get some poaching, etc. money. The Pac offers Memphis and Tulane on a "figure out what your exit fee is then let's talk more" level. The Pac whispers to The CW or others, and they start to hash out a tentative TV deal.
I feel like I'm watching a rerun of Get Smart. Question is, who is Maxwell Smart and who is Agent 99? Gloria or Teresa?You say merge easily but every interview with the new commissioner points to her not wanting to do that. If it was easy it would've been done. She wanted to have both all the money or a large portion of it and get a larger tv deal cut to join and when the MWC turned around and said you need us, she flipped to trying to break them apart. There is assumptions a tv deal was ar least discussed but we also know Boise and SDSU think very highly of themselves and could easily be sold to join a new conference whose outlook has potential to be better than MWC for them if they defect. Then she offered to pay their fees so it became a no brainer... the problem now is you have 2-4 other programs asking for same deal and money gets tight, plus whatever assurances and promises were made to the 4 defectors... it's not easy
I do not see how there would be any benefit for Memphis or Tulane to join the watered down PAC. The only way this could work would be if they had enough teams in the PAC on both the east and west coast, otherwise the other programs would be doing a lot of travelling across the country, not just in football, but also in all the other sports. It is unlikely that those two programs would see enough of an increase, if any, in the TV contract compared to what they currently get to offset the increased cost to the entire athletic department which would be into the millions. It appears that what will be left for the PAC is coming back to the MWC, or the few lower level schools in the American Conference, that are located in Texas or surrounding areas. These schools would include North Texas (2-1 2023 attendance 17,761), possibly Tulsa (1-2 2023 attendance 20,187), and UTSA (1-2 2023 attendance 28,876). They could also look at the Sun Belt West with Arkansas State (2-1 2023 attendance 16,747) and Texas State (2-1 2023 attendance 21,184) or Conference USA with UTEP (0-3 2023 attendance 18,160). In my believe, all of these schools are a big drop off from the current MWC with the possible exception of UTSA. The only school in the group with good attendance is UTSA. We never know what is going to happen until it happens, but I am starting to wonder if BSU and SDSU screwed the pooch again because of their ongoing greed?
You say merge easily but every interview with the new commissioner points to her not wanting to do that. If it was easy it would've been done. She wanted to have both all the money or a large portion of it and get a larger tv deal cut to join and when the MWC turned around and said you need us, she flipped to trying to break them apart. There is assumptions a tv deal was ar least discussed but we also know Boise and SDSU think very highly of themselves and could easily be sold to join a new conference whose outlook has potential to be better than MWC for them if they defect. Then she offered to pay their fees so it became a no brainer... the problem now is you have 2-4 other programs asking for same deal and money gets tight, plus whatever assurances and promises were made to the 4 defectors... it's not easyThere is some logical reasoning, at least for me. Could the PAC 2 be the biggest swindlers ever? Perhaps, but that seems to be somewhat unlikely.
Teams do not bolt for new conferences without having some idea of what that TV contract will be. It is arguable to SOLE reason realignment even happens these days. It seems to have very little to do with regionality, historical rivals, etc.
The PAC 2 could have easily merged/reverse merged with the MW. Those 2 additions along with everyone else would have likely pushed the total payout per school to 6-7 million I would guess.
Boise jumped ship and they make more than everyone else in the MW, so at the very least the new PAC should be getting more than that easily. Especially when considering the possible fees they may have to at least partially pay.
No secret that the PAC is targeting AAC schools including Memphis. Memphis currently gets 7 mil per year, though the long term stability of that is threatened. But then you factor in travel costs.
It would be extremely foolish to approach Memphis with any confidence without offering at the very least 9 mil per year. Probably at least 10.
There were reports before this happened that a rebuilt PAC, which included UNLV and Air Force could get 15 mil per year. But who knows how accurate that was.
But I think 10+ is a pretty safe bet. Why would the PAC 2 willingly give up at the very least 43 million dollars to create their own conference by raiding the MW if their contract wasn't at least significantly better that what they would have gotten by merging? It has to be a substantial bump for this to make any type of financial sense. They could have simply joined the MW in some fashion, and kept all of their PAC money they netted from being raided themselves.
The PAC TV deal for 2026 is not even in place, nobody has any idea what that equates to 2 years down the road. Where is the $10MM coming from?
All the P12 is, is a brand name. I mean I get what you're saying, but it's not as strong nationally as you think. We all know most of the rest of the USA thought the previous P12 was ass already and now it has a bunch of MWC and AAC teams with Wazzu and Oregon State? Meh.
There is also no reasonable assumption UNLV's going to stick it out in the MWC.
There is some logical reasoning, at least for me. Could the PAC 2 be the biggest swindlers ever? Perhaps, but that seems to be somewhat unlikely.The PAC TV deal for 2026 is not even in place, nobody has any idea what that equates to 2 years down the road. Where is the $10MM coming from?
All the P12 is, is a brand name. I mean I get what you're saying, but it's not as strong nationally as you think. We all know most of the rest of the USA thought the previous P12 was ass already and now it has a bunch of MWC and AAC teams with Wazzu and Oregon State? Meh.
There is also no reasonable assumption UNLV's going to stick it out in the MWC.
I don't think the SEC cares.You think Alabama or anyone in the SEC wants to see that happen?
I hope it does but skeptical we see more than 1 G5 program get in barring something crazy like 2 undefeated G5 teams that win their conference. Even then I 'Oh we think 2 loss Ole Miss deserves that spot their schedule is just so much tougher than NMSU or Liberty'.
Sure, lets offer them more media revenue so they get an additional 16 million each and we get nothing. They might go for it. CSU and Fresno and the Pac-2 can pound sand.Imagine BSU and SDSU coming back groveling again!
The PAC TV deal for 2026 is not even in place, nobody has any idea what that equates to 2 years down the road. Where is the $10MM coming from?If I'm getting 10 million a year and you are getting 1.5 million a year on media revenue I'm at an immediate advantage.
Secondly the success of the program is driven in part by money.
Conference affiliation creates ceilings for programs.
A team from the Sun Belt is never going to win a national title. They are also very unlikely to get into the new CFP even if they run the table. Their conference affiliation (weaker conference schedule) will get them passed over by another G5 who may have one loss.
So looking ahead.
PAC has their current 6 plus add UTSA, MEMPHIS,TULANE, USF.
MWC somehow cobbles together NMSU Texas State, North Texas and let's say Sam Houston State.
Boise goes 12-0 wins PAC
UNLV Also goes 12-0 wins MWC
Who gets the group of 5 bid?
Likely Boise based on tougher schedule.
More realistic scenario.
Both go 11-1. Boise still gets in. Now they start filling the 12 team playoffs.
Boise in. SEC champ in. ACC champ in. SEC champ in. BIG 10 Champ in. Big 12 Champ in. No way the powers that be aren't putting in the next best teams from the Big10 and SEC in. Those 12 spots are going to fill up quick and no way a second G5 program is going to get the nod.
Imagine BSU and SDSU coming back groveling again!I’m hoping the PAC stays put at six schools and UNLV has a lot to do with that!
Just curious how you think they will offset the travel cost for Memphis, USC, and Tulane for their other sports? By the time you figure in the millions in additional travel cost for all the other athletic programs at Tulane and Memphis, it could end up as closer to a wash unless they get a large increase in TV contract money from a conference that doesn't currently have a single ranked team and no TV contract.If I'm getting 10 million a year and you are getting 1.5 million a year on media revenue I'm at an immediate advantage.
Secondly the success of the program is driven in part by money.
Conference affiliation creates ceilings for programs.
A team from the Sun Belt is never going to win a national title. They are also very unlikely to get into the new CFP even if they run the table. Their conference affiliation (weaker conference schedule) will get them passed over by another G5 who may have one loss.
So looking ahead.
PAC has their current 6 plus add UTSA, MEMPHIS,TULANE, USF.
MWC somehow cobbles together NMSU Texas State, North Texas and let's say Sam Houston State.
Boise goes 12-0 wins PAC
UNLV Also goes 12-0 wins MWC
Who gets the group of 5 bid?
Likely Boise based on tougher schedule.
More realistic scenario.
Both go 11-1. Boise still gets in. Now they start filling the 12 team playoffs.
Boise in. SEC champ in. ACC champ in. SEC champ in. BIG 10 Champ in. Big 12 Champ in. No way the powers that be aren't putting in the next best teams from the Big10 and SEC in. Those 12 spots are going to fill up quick and no way a second G5 program is going to get the nod.
The one saving grace to that is the G5 play in tournament/game that has been suggested for that last playoff spot. That sounds good if you aren't in the best G5. Sounds bad if you are in the best G5 conference.
I think this year the MW is the best mostly die to the top of the conference.
I totally get the merge idea. The one thing that sucks is dragging reno into it. Can we merge without them. I mean let's just get away from them and end the bullshit discussions we have regards the BOR each time this realignment comes up.I think UNLV and AFA will be risking a lot to jump to the AAC. At least anytime soon.
They would br paying 17 to enter a conference that could get gutted again. We would not be getting 7 mil and would likely never see a number close to that.
Memphis could say that they are staying and still leave.
Also if the aac foes get gutted there is a chance that the remaining MW and AAC merge. Which would be better for UNLV. They get to NOT pay 17 mil and still get their cut of the exit fees from the other conferences.
I think this is the 3rd best case scenario after the Big 12 and the PAC
yeah, the MW/AAC merger would make a lot of sense. All of this changing conference stuff is really annoying IMO.I think UNLV and AFA will be risking a lot to jump to the AAC. At least anytime soon.
They would br paying 17 to enter a conference that could get gutted again. We would not be getting 7 mil and would likely never see a number close to that.
Memphis could say that they are staying and still leave.
Also if the aac foes get gutted there is a chance that the remaining MW and AAC merge. Which would be better for UNLV. They get to NOT pay 17 mil and still get their cut of the exit fees from the other conferences.
I think this is the 3rd best case scenario after the Big 12 and the PAC
The one saving grace to that is the G5 play in tournament/game that has been suggested for that last playoff spot. That sounds good if you aren't in the best G5. Sounds bad if you are in the best G5 conference.If I'm getting 10 million a year and you are getting 1.5 million a year on media revenue I'm at an immediate advantage.
Secondly the success of the program is driven in part by money.
Conference affiliation creates ceilings for programs.
A team from the Sun Belt is never going to win a national title. They are also very unlikely to get into the new CFP even if they run the table. Their conference affiliation (weaker conference schedule) will get them passed over by another G5 who may have one loss.
So looking ahead.
PAC has their current 6 plus add UTSA, MEMPHIS,TULANE, USF.
MWC somehow cobbles together NMSU Texas State, North Texas and let's say Sam Houston State.
Boise goes 12-0 wins PAC
UNLV Also goes 12-0 wins MWC
Who gets the group of 5 bid?
Likely Boise based on tougher schedule.
More realistic scenario.
Both go 11-1. Boise still gets in. Now they start filling the 12 team playoffs.
Boise in. SEC champ in. ACC champ in. SEC champ in. BIG 10 Champ in. Big 12 Champ in. No way the powers that be aren't putting in the next best teams from the Big10 and SEC in. Those 12 spots are going to fill up quick and no way a second G5 program is going to get the nod.
Your shit is ****ed up. I navigated over to that thread and clicked on reply and it works fine.
I think UNLV and AFA will be risking a lot to jump to the AAC. At least anytime soon.I think that UNLV and AF should be on the phone with the AAC, Memphis, and the other schools and let them know we would join them in their conference. It would keep the AAC alive. UNLV and Memphis could make a strong run each year for the CFP. It certainly help with both our strength of schedule in conference play. It would save them the 2 million dollars in travel costs if they stayed in the AAC. This would certainly give our basketball a breath of fresh air they need along with a new coach.