ADVERTISEMENT

Finally got him!

I think it’s funny that change was wanted and very necessary but now that it’s happened, after many here on rebelnet thought it would not happen due to money are now quick to be negative?

They are quick to say things have not changed because they don’t like Pastner as coach or after one recruit has been signed but identified as sub par because he didn’t start at his last college.

We now have a coach that was eager to get back into the college coaching game ( here of all places) and is considered a good recruiter who has ideas and a plan for attacking the NIL landscape.

This description of Pastner sounds like a “polar opposite” of the guy preceding him who sounded and looked lost while on the job here most of the time.

It is a breath of fresh air here now and some are even anxious for what might be coming next for UNLV basketball, count me as one who is eager to see what Josh will do next.

I’m fine with being one of the few that is anticipating the next move that will be made. I have been negative here because of bad hires in football and basketball for years and argued with many about Lon, Rice, Menzies, Cheeseburger and Kevin not to mention Hauck and Arroyo.

Now arguing, not so much! Football is on good ground now and I think basketball is heading in a new and good direction. I love it and I ain’t asking anyone to agree with me or for their permission!

I think Josh was the right hire for the situation due to the lack off money and I will go it alone thinking that, if need be.

Get it done for us here at UNLV, coach Pastner!
What you fail to understand many don’t see Pastner as a big upgrade to Kruger. Yes he’s an upgrade but to what extent instead of 18 win seasons and 6th it’s 20 wins and 5th in the MWC. That’s not exciting. Yes Pastner had some success but majority of that success was in his early years with majority of the ex coaches players so it’s hard to get up and think that he’s all of a sudden figured things out. I will be rooting for him and may like some of the players he’s bringing in. But until he actually has success here it’s a coin flip
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Finally got him!

IT'S OK TO GET EXCITED ABOUT NEW PLAYERS. YES NOBODY KNOWS HOW WELL THEY WILL PLAY BUT FANS WANTED change and they got it. JUST THAT CHANGE BRINGS HOPE. NO MORE KRUGER . LET'S MAKE UNLV REBELGIRL WRONG. POSITIVE VIBES. CHANGE THE CULTURE WITH CONFIDENCE.

If Syracuse wanted him he can’t be completely useless.
that’s the team that we shoulda played in our prime.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees

A total save-face would be adding UNLV. A revenge save-face would be SJSU (The most likely) or one of the other MWC schools. Rumored on X was the reverse merger was being discussed during the mediation.

I think Texas St is where Memphis & Tulane were when it comes to future options. They have an easy shot at an AAC invite in the near future when Memphis and/or Tulane & USF get called up to a P4 during the next conference restructure. Why risk it for peanuts when this restructure is literally right around the corner during the next media negotiations. Who wants to rebrand twice within a 4 year period? I still believe the last realistic option for the PAC is NMSU or Sac St.

...unless they pony up the cash for a UNLV. And it would have to be a substantial amount of money for the fines we'd be on the hook for.
I don't see where SJSU would be remotely likely. If UNLV got wind that other MWC members were offered and figured out how to leave, I'd guess they would revisit the conversation if offered. And if UNLV did revisit, they'd have to be the preferred MWC member. Even in a revenge scenario, is self-sabotage worthwhile?

To the clowns at SDSU, maybe.

Also, I don't think Sac State helps Pac 12 with their minimum 8 members before best case 2029, does it? If they began the FBS transition this year, wouldn't we expect a period of 3-4 years of transition? FCS to FBS doesn't happen often, I was mostly thinking of all the WAC schools that went D2 to D1, but since that excludes football, it's not necessarily helpful

Finally got him!

Need another big man. Emmanuel wont play all 40 minutes, and big men seam to get into foul trouble. Would like a guy that can play 15ish minutes without a drop off
Agree with this!

But bad bigs who don’t know how to defend get into foul trouble, see Cherry or N’Diaye and most every other big that’s been here the last 10+ years.

I just watched a young big with UCF play most of the game in the CBC tournament against Nebraska and he did not get the dumb fouls our centers would get.

I hope Pastner develops this with Stephen!

Finally got him!

I think it’s funny that change was wanted and very necessary but now that it’s happened, after many here on rebelnet thought it would not happen due to money are now quick to be negative?

They are quick to say things have not changed because they don’t like Pastner as coach or after one recruit has been signed but identified as sub par because he didn’t start at his last college.

We now have a coach that was eager to get back into the college coaching game ( here of all places) and is considered a good recruiter who has ideas and a plan for attacking the NIL landscape.

This description of Pastner sounds like a “polar opposite” of the guy preceding him who sounded and looked lost while on the job here most of the time.

It is a breath of fresh air here now and some are even anxious for what might be coming next for UNLV basketball, count me as one who is eager to see what Josh will do next.

I’m fine with being one of the few that is anticipating the next move that will be made. I have been negative here because of bad hires in football and basketball for years and argued with many about Lon, Rice, Menzies, Cheeseburger and Kevin not to mention Hauck and Arroyo.

Now arguing, not so much! Football is on good ground now and I think basketball is heading in a new and good direction. I love it and I ain’t asking anyone to agree with me or for their permission!

I think Josh was the right hire for the situation due to the lack off money and I will go it alone thinking that, if need be.

Get it done for us here at UNLV, coach Pastner!
Pastner wasn't the 1st choice for most of us but just his enthusiasm and energy is an upgrade over Kruger . Go Rebs.,!

MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees

Because they don't really want them.

Let's say the following X rumors are true.

PAC media deal came in at 75 mil. For 9 members at a full share (Gonzaga plus whoever 8th football school is) that works out to an AAV of 8.33 million per school.

Do you think Boise wants to get paid the same as Texas State?

A half share of that would be around 4.5 million.

On paper that looks solid for Texas State except their travel costs would eat up a bunch of the added money they would be making

So they would be barely breaking even on a half share and be at a competitive disadvantage financially and with travel.

If that 75 million is correct, even adding some solid Eastern time zone teams still wouldn't that that number high enough to offset travel costs.

I do believe MWC schools may still be on the table despite the GOR.

8 million per year is better than the 4 mil being floated for the MWC.

It comes down to does a school want to or can it afford the exit fees. And how much would the PAC be willing to cover.
A total save-face would be adding UNLV. A revenge save-face would be SJSU (The most likely) or one of the other MWC schools. Rumored on X was the reverse merger was being discussed during the mediation.

I think Texas St is where Memphis & Tulane were when it comes to future options. They have an easy shot at an AAC invite in the near future when Memphis and/or Tulane & USF get called up to a P4 during the next conference restructure. Why risk it for peanuts when this restructure is literally right around the corner during the next media negotiations. Who wants to rebrand twice within a 4 year period? I still believe the last realistic option for the PAC is NMSU or Sac St.

...unless they pony up the cash for a UNLV. And it would have to be a substantial amount of money for the fines we'd be on the hook for.

MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees

They're so Fd... how do you absolutely need a full member but continue to try and undersell those teams you want to join you...

Because they don't really want them.

Let's say the following X rumors are true.

PAC media deal came in at 75 mil. For 9 members at a full share (Gonzaga plus whoever 8th football school is) that works out to an AAV of 8.33 million per school.

Do you think Boise wants to get paid the same as Texas State?

A half share of that would be around 4.5 million.

On paper that looks solid for Texas State except their travel costs would eat up a bunch of the added money they would be making

So they would be barely breaking even on a half share and be at a competitive disadvantage financially and with travel.

If that 75 million is correct, even adding some solid Eastern time zone teams still wouldn't that that number high enough to offset travel costs.

I do believe MWC schools may still be on the table despite the GOR.

8 million per year is better than the 4 mil being floated for the MWC.

It comes down to does a school want to or can it afford the exit fees. And how much would the PAC be willing to cover.

Finally got him!

I think it’s funny that change was wanted and very necessary but now that it’s happened, after many here on rebelnet thought it would not happen due to money are now quick to be negative?

They are quick to say things have not changed because they don’t like Pastner as coach or after one recruit has been signed but identified as sub par because he didn’t start at his last college.

We now have a coach that was eager to get back into the college coaching game (here at UNLV of all places) and is considered a good recruiter who has ideas and a plan for attacking the NIL landscape.

This description of Pastner sounds like a “polar opposite” of the guy preceding him who sounded and looked lost while on the job here most of the time.

It is a breath of fresh air here now and some are even anxious for what might be coming next for UNLV basketball, count me as one who is eager to see what Josh will do next.

I’m fine with being one of the few that is anticipating the next move that will be made. I have been negative here because of bad hires in football and basketball for years and argued with many about Lon, Rice, Menzies, Cheeseburger and Kevin not to mention Hauck and Arroyo.

Now arguing, not so much! Football is on good ground now and I think basketball is heading in a new and good direction. I love it and I ain’t asking anyone to agree with me or for their permission!

I think Josh was the right hire for the situation due to the lack off money and I will go it alone thinking that, if need be.

Get it done for us here at UNLV, coach Pastner!

MWC & PAC Mediation Discussion for Poaching & Exit Fees

They're so Fd... how do you absolutely need a full member but continue to try and undersell those teams you want to join you...
Stupidity! Remember the PAC has some of the same leadership in place that were on staff of the commissioners office who declined to invite Texas and Oklahoma.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT