Assuming Hawaii gets done..Then what?
- Rebel Football
- 78 Replies
There isnt a perfect solution and thats what the Pac 12 are finding out as well. They all chose to cripple themselves potentially vs conference opponents by the terms they signed on for, with unbalanced payouts for CFP and NCAA credits. Their banking on a trade off that the teams included in the deal will help drive up the media market price, but they failed to factor in that just about every team not named Boise they added are awful this year when they need to be out negotiating the TV deals. They had to give away the equal tournament credit distribution to attract Gonzaga and SDSU. Now they are finding out same as us, that there arent a lot of valuable dance partners across the G5 landscape and the ones who are, are locked into their current spots and arent willfully budging. Were lucky in that we only needed 2 new partners to legitimize our conference in the NCAA eyes and from a dollars and value perspective, it was easy to add UTEP and potentially make Hawaii a full sport partner. That doesn't necessarily cripple the MWC, while it wont be the standalone top tier as it currently really is across both football and basketball, its still a potentially top tier G5.
Meanwhile the Pac 12 needs to add 1 team, but theyve already compromised their original values to create the top tiered conference, the product they brought is woefully underwhelming this year, and they couldnt secure the bigger fishes they wanted and now that the contract terms are public, theyre probably going to have a harder time attracting filler tier programs. It sucks that instead of being the best conference far and above, they thought they could cut the dead weight, give themselves competitive advantages financially, and everyone would just play ball and join in...
I agree with a lot of that except SDSU/FRESNO are massive markets so their middling results really don't matter in terms of media packages. They've been good enough in the past. We are what? Three years removed from SDSU being if not top dog sharing that with Boise? CSU again middling results but big TV market. USU is the anomaly, but they've had steady results.
To get Memphis and it make any financial sense I have to imagine it would require paying majority if not all of their exit fee and a Media deal around 12 million per. That would be 3 million more than current AAC deal. Seems like a lot of that would get eaten up in travel costs.
They absolutely appear to have over played their hand.
One thing about the deal UNLV agreed to stay in MWC I'm not sure about is the lump sum and subsequent 1.5 million dollar payments. How I understood it was that 1.5 was to compensate UNLV for potential media rights shortfall.
What I don't know is let's say MWC somehow scrapes together a media deal equal to the 5 million the get now. Does UNLV still get that 1.5 million per year on top of the media deal? Or was that simply a safety net?