ADVERTISEMENT

Coaching scenario....thoughts?

Let's say that Odom got poached while Marion is still at UNLV as the OC.

Would you consider the him as the replacement for Odom as head coach?

Young, super intelligent black man who appears to be able to truly relate to the guys around. It also appears he has some serious connections.


Could be a serious home run until, hopefully, someone poaches him because we are continuing to grow and WIN as a program.

Thoughts?
  • Like
Reactions: Rebel_Luv

CORE..

Hate to be negative, but regardless of how the Rebs finish out.. We need a new coach.. Top two hires for me are Will Wade &… Bob Huggins.. I guess we are too PC for both..

But, I see a core with this group.. A backcourt of Thomas/Hicks & front court of Whaley/Cottrell, add in Hill applying for medical redshirt? That’s a strong roster to bulk & add some pieces, plus our incoming class.. We can compete!

Curious about the future, what we think?
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

Billy-Ball NIL Concept

I've been thinking that NIL has not only thrown recruiting into new ground but it could be doing the same for coaching searches.

Traditionally, the best coach has been a mix of several characteristics. Manager, X-O gamer, Press Speaker, NCAA navigator, NANNY etc, etc. One of his main responsibilities, if not the main responsibility, is RECRUITING. Better players can make an average coach look way better than he is. With NIL, recruiting is becoming less and less his responsibility. In fact, it's gone from his biggest responsibility to one that is, to some degree at least, out of his hands.

Assumption: The University has $ 1 mil a year for a coach that can be supplemented an additional $ 1.5 mil a year by wealthy boosters. ( I don't have specifics but you can insert any amount you want for the argument)

Proposition: Wouldn't it be better to spend the $ 1 mil on the coach and take the doner $ 1.5 mil and put it up for NIL payments for a few more top flight players?

Now, before anyone has his head explode look a the chart below ( incomplete and a year old, but the best I could find and it serves it's purpose for this post) You need to pay $ 2.5 mil to get a coach paid in the top 50. But when you look at some of the coaches getting that type of cash there are at least 20 of them we would be threatening to run out of town. They were a flash in pan, got hired, and now they are coming back to earth but with a pile of cash. So, I propose we pay our coach @ 1 mil from school funds and pay our players as much as possible. If the coach leaves, who cares - we get another one for a mil. If a couple of players get better deals - so what - we can pay new ones.

The goal would be to have the best players we can afford with an OK coach - rather than O.K. players with a 50th ranked coach.

Just a thought.


  • Like
Reactions: dcut03

Rebounding

Outrebounded again tonight.

We are 286th for total rebounds in the country.

This is a HUGE flaw as a team. I don't want to compare us to the teams at the very top but let's compare us to the College of Charleston. They are ranked 20th and they average 41 rebounds a game. We average 34 rebounds per game. 7 times we should be getting the ball and instead we give it to our opponent. Seven shots we can't take and seven shots they do.

This has become a characteristic of a CKK team. Rebounding is a basic tenant of good basketball. We will never compete at the top without drastically improving our rebounding.
  • Like
Reactions: CRhodes1983

Fast Breaks

Tonight I don't believe we had one fast break off a defensive rebound. We did have three or four from steals/TO's but not off rebounds.

There were a least 6 times DTJ had the ball off a rebound and specifically pulled up at mid court. This has to be planned and coached. He has the ability to penetrate into the paint every time down the court off a rebound. I don't believe he can get to the basket every time but if we had a cutter he could get it to him fairly easy.

Fast breaks are easy points and so demoralizing to an opponent. I don't understand why KK has eliminated it from out offense completely.

Does he value each possession so much he is afraid of a turnover. Is he trying to slow a game to limit possessions because he knows we suck offensively?

I just don't get it.

Spent the last 2 hours sitting and talking with a former Rebel. He trained my son 2 years ago

and it was my son’s senior night. He was kind enough to come and support him.

We talked about the good old days. Fun insights (mostly confirmations of what we had heard) into the teams he played for.

I grew up during the 80s and 90s teams but he may still go down as a top 3 rebel for me. Even before tonight. Tonight solidified what I had already thought of him.
  • Love
Reactions: LVRebel2000
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT