ADVERTISEMENT

AAC - ACC

The AAC is being used as leverage, IMO.

Maybe if the MWC wants to keep us, they give us a higher payout (The Boise special). Maybe the PAC gets worried the AAC starts making moves to counter their poaching plans. It’s obvious the AAC has an extremely competent commish that is very proactive and doesn’t need a “threat caster” (what the hell was that?) .

Regardless, there’s options and you have to use them to get what you want. It’s like buying a car, you have one you really like but you can’t let them know that. You pit different sellers against each other to get the best deal.

It’s leverage. I like where we’re at.

AAC - ACC

If the FSU/Clemson lawsuit continues there is a strong possibility Memphis and/or Tulane will not jump to the PAC any time soon. They would be foolish to pay exit fees when FSU/Clemson could bolt from the ACC and open space for them in that conference. The ACC currently receives a payout of over $ 40 million. It would degrade significantly without FSU/Clemson but not so much Memphis and Tulane wouldn't love to be a part of the conference. I see it in their best interest to wait and see.
This is what I have been told. Tulane and Memphis are holding out for ACC defectors, and that Pac2 wanted to them to apply with the MWC4. Didn't happen, but still could.

AAC - ACC

Many on the board see the AAC as a way to keep ourselves relevant. I agree it could work - but it's nowhere near automatic.

IMO, the ACC and their ongoing Lawsuit(s) / discussions with Florida State and Clemson are a player in the calculations that need to be considered.
See article below dated yesterday.

If the FSU/Clemson lawsuit continues there is a strong possibility Memphis and/or Tulane will not jump to the PAC any time soon. They would be foolish to pay exit fees when FSU/Clemson could bolt from the ACC and open space for them in that conference. The ACC currently receives a payout of over $ 40 million. It would degrade significantly without FSU/Clemson but not so much Memphis and Tulane wouldn't love to be a part of the conference. I see it in their best interest to wait and see.

If they don't jump, then the AAC will be at 14 schools. Their near term options would be stay at 14 or expand. If they choose to expand (and that isn't a given) AF would likely be their first choice for expansion. But all the discussions about AF is conjecture and there's been no statements from the AAC. It could just as easily be the AAC stays at 14 and decides not to take on the additional travel for AF and UNLV. Or it could be they take AF and decide on an additional Texas school or Eastern school instead of us.

This entire fiasco is conjecture, but I don't think an AAC birth is as obvious as many of us hope.
Good thing is we may know soon. PAC seems anxious to get to eight sooner rather than later.

IF REMAINING MWC TEAMS WERE SMART

Here is the question you should be asking If the PAC deal is not better then why would they even target the AAC schools? Especially with the travel? That answer is easy, they wouldn't.
The MW contract is what it is because there is a ton of dead weight at the middle and bottom of the league. Part of the reaso. Theu didnt want a merger/reverse merger. OSU and WAZZ are worth more than probably every MW school. Then take the 4 best markets out of the MW that helped raise our profile and now you are looking at potentially 10+ mil per school.
Because they need to get to 8 teams and don't want to pay another 80 million dollars to do it... and they're trying to sell the weak Pac brand to them over conference affiliation like AAC...
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

…wasn’t the only reason.

Well the Big East (basketball only) just signed a deal worth $80m annually, so there certainly is some value. We wouldn’t be able to command that much, but I do think it would help a bit. Could be wrong though. Often am. Just was the reason behind my thinking there.
The Big East isn't a power conference and is exclusively Basketball and carries the top non-foootball schools in the Country with Villinova, Marquette, Creighton, and UCONN with a primarily East Coast based media market... they are not the same
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

IF REMAINING MWC TEAMS WERE SMART

Memphis and Tulane are not in the CUSA. Will the PAC 6 media deal beat the AAC? The MWC was not better.. I don’t see where WSU or OSU and 4 MWC teams will do much better, if any than the current AAC with their TV deal.
Here is the question you should be asking If the PAC deal is not better then why would they even target the AAC schools? Especially with the travel? That answer is easy, they wouldn't.
The MW contract is what it is because there is a ton of dead weight at the middle and bottom of the league. Part of the reaso. Theu didnt want a merger/reverse merger. OSU and WAZZ are worth more than probably every MW school. Then take the 4 best markets out of the MW that helped raise our profile and now you are looking at potentially 10+ mil per school.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

AAC - ACC

Many on the board see the AAC as a way to keep ourselves relevant. I agree it could work - but it's nowhere near automatic.

IMO, the ACC and their ongoing Lawsuit(s) / discussions with Florida State and Clemson are a player in the calculations that need to be considered.
See article below dated yesterday.

If the FSU/Clemson lawsuit continues there is a strong possibility Memphis and/or Tulane will not jump to the PAC any time soon. They would be foolish to pay exit fees when FSU/Clemson could bolt from the ACC and open space for them in that conference. The ACC currently receives a payout of over $ 40 million. It would degrade significantly without FSU/Clemson but not so much Memphis and Tulane wouldn't love to be a part of the conference. I see it in their best interest to wait and see.

If they don't jump, then the AAC will be at 14 schools. Their near term options would be stay at 14 or expand. If they choose to expand (and that isn't a given) AF would likely be their first choice for expansion. But all the discussions about AF is conjecture and there's been no statements from the AAC. It could just as easily be the AAC stays at 14 and decides not to take on the additional travel for AF and UNLV. Or it could be they take AF and decide on an additional Texas school or Eastern school instead of us.

This entire fiasco is conjecture, but I don't think an AAC birth is as obvious as many of us hope.

How to increase UNLV's digital footprint

I'm not sure. I'm sure there are some tech guys around here the could provide some more insight though. I know there was a guy that was converting a lot of the old Rebel bball games to digital that I think worked in programming. Can't remember his name of the top of my head though.
Robert Worthen..the original recording God.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

How to increase UNLV's digital footprint

We need players to keep flopping on the field to garner national attention...also, bad beats.

Sadly, that's the only way to get impressions, nationally. Need it done in 30 second clips.
Last week was the anniversaryArkansas State flopped badly against the U and looked really bad.

UNLV immortalized against Kansas and it worked to perfection.
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000

ESPN ARTICLE DETAILING WHAT WENT DOWN

After reading this article I hope the top 3 schools left in mwc go to the aac and it keeps all the aac teams from going to the pac12 and the pac12 blows up

Based on a number of media reports...

AFA is in serious talks with AAC.

AAC currently sits at 14 teams.

Other media reports are saying Memphis is near a deal with PAC12 and Tulane probably not far behind.

If that plays out AAC would be sitting at 13 teams.

That potentially leaves three open spots in the AAC to get to 16 (if they want to get to 16) Can't see them sitting at 13. So just 14 is also a possibility.

Purely a guess but I would imagine (hope) UNLV is at least in talks with AAC and I wouldn't be surprised if 2 others (UNM & USU?) Are also talking to AAC.

I'm not suggesting this is where UNLV is leaning towards going or even wants to go, but they would be right to at least be in talks with AAC as a potential landing spot if PAC talks fizzle.

Just my opinion/guess here.

MWC remaining schools could stand firm and MWC could use exit fee money to attempt to poach some schools from AAC or CUSA.

That said if both AFA and UNLV leave MWC is in serious jeopardy.

ESPN ARTICLE DETAILING WHAT WENT DOWN

This pretty much explains how we got here.

And now it is Barry Odom's sworn duty to kick the @#$% $%@#$ @#$%& out of SDSU this year.

You'll understand when you read the quote.

UNLV was NEVER in the initial talks.

ALSO every school left should be able to dissolve based on lack of faith and ineptitude of commisioner.

You'll understand when you read this.

Threatcaster..

Remember that word..

Your head will spin.

After reading this article I hope the top 3 schools left in mwc go to the aac and it keeps all the aac teams from going to the pac12 and the pac12 blows up
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT