Loyal Coug1 said:

I've said many times that I don't like what the Pac-2 is doing and has done. But give us some credit. OSU and WSU have more cachet than anyone in the MW and are as good as any of you in FB. As you will see this fall. So if you think that a conference with SJSU, UNM, Reno and USU is "basically the same conference" as the Pac, I would respectfully disagree.

Click to expand...

LVRebel2000 said:

Has anyone heard how the seat sales went with the $25 tickets? Or how many tickets have been sold/given away, total? I'm not sure when the students are able to get their tickets, or if those are already accounted for.

Click to expand...

RebelScrub said:

bull mastiff. You are retarded Motorola was founded by Israel.

Yeah those beepers that you had in the 90’s

There’s a Taiwanese company that sold beepers to people and it’s about to go bankrupt.

Login to view embedded media
Moron AOC speaks up. She’s the worst

Click to expand...

reagan21 said:

their view is because they're expecting more money from a TV deal that doesn't exist.

Click to expand...

Loyal Coug1 said:

I've said many times that I don't like what the Pac-2 is doing and has done. But give us some credit. OSU and WSU have more cachet than anyone in the MW and are as good as any of you in FB. As you will see this fall. So if you think that a conference with SJSU, UNM, Reno and USU is "basically the same conference" as the Pac, I would respectfully disagree.

Click to expand...

Meister_Rebel said:

I wish I could get you the document. All I have is a PDF on my hard drive. I'm ****ing clueless as how to put that on this forum.

SCHEDULE 7 WITHDRAWAL FEE The Pac-12 Parties shall pay MWC a Withdrawal Fee in accordance with this Schedule 7 for each Accepting MWC Member Institution during the Withdrawal Fee Period. For purposes of illustration, and not limitation, the “Aggregate Withdrawal Fee” column represents the aggregate Withdrawal Fee payable by the Pac-12 Parties to MWC relative to the total number of Accepting MWC Member Institutions during the Withdrawal Fee Period. Accepting MWC Member Institutions Withdrawal Fee Aggregate Withdrawal Fees Accepting MWC Member

Institution #1 $10,000,000 $10,000,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #2 $10,500,000 $20,500,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #3 $11,000,000 $31,500,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #4 $11,500,000 $43,000,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #5 $12,000,000 $55,000,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #6 $12,500,000 $67,500,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #7 $13,000,000 $80,500,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #8 $13,500,000 $94,000,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #9 $14,000,000 $108,000,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #10 $14,500,000 $122,500,000

Accepting MWC Member Institution #11 $15,000,000 $137,500,000

Click to expand...

Loyal Coug1 said:

Oh? Do you have a link or other information to support that statement? Other than has been reported, that the Pac-2 was expected to "help" with the exit fees......

Click to expand...

InZoneU said:

I don't get it either. We are gripping to pay an exit fee to get into basically the same conference we're already in. With no guarantee auto-bid for the champion? Why would the TV money or exposure be any better in the long run? Just play some good OOC teams, run your shitty conference and you're in the mix for a playoff spot.

Click to expand...

reagan21 said:

Because they're not paying the exit fees.

Click to expand...

rebeltob said:

If they were to jump to the pac to play the same teams they've already been playing and could have been playing...

Click to expand...

Bullmastiff 1 said:

It's addition by subtraction.

Click to expand...

rebeltob said:

If they were to jump to the pac to play the same teams they've already been playing and could have been playing...

Click to expand...

reagan21 said:

Because they're not paying the exit fees.

Click to expand...

rebeltob said:

UNLV paying huge exit fees to go to the same level of conference they've been in so lame. Same with the 4 MWC schools that already jumped. This whole thing makes no sense and seems to rely on so many what-ifs

Click to expand...

WarthogRebel said:

see Boise.

Click to expand...

WarthogRebel said:

"I thought I read yesterday that the ACC/FSU/CLEMSON drama looked like it was going to likely get cleared up."

This involves a potential new revenue structure where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Spitballing here - you'd need 8 or 9 presidents to agree. So they would have to balance what they think they could get with FSU/Clem vs. what they calculate they are worth without them. All would depend on the numbers. Guaranteed bad blood however - see Boise.

Click to expand...

rebeltob said:

UNLV paying huge exit fees to go to the same level of conference they've been in so lame. Same with the 4 MWC schools that already jumped. This whole thing makes no sense and seems to rely on so many what-is ...

Click to expand...

Loyal Coug1 said:

Assuming the exit fee must be paid when you actually exit (7/1/26), and with the assumption that the _Pac-2 is going to help with the exit fees, you telling me UNLV can't have an almost 2-year fundraising campaign to raise the $17M (less Pac help) that they would need?

Click to expand...

LVRebel2000 said:

I think the issue with the ACC is heading in the direction of being settled, but it would depend on how much the ACC decides to give them, and how things are looking with regards to the GOR lawsuit.

If the ACC agrees to give extra money to FSU and/or Clemson, what about the other schools? Will UNC ask for more? Miami? Louisville? I have a hard time believing that all of these other schools are okay with taking a big pay cut to give more to a handful of other schools, but who knows? Especially with the way FSU is looking in football this year. 😂

Click to expand...