UNLV Offered. . .
- By Rebel1986
- Rebel Football
- 67 Replies
Nothing better than to take a player from a future PAC school!
Nothing better than to take a player from a future PAC school!
PAC2: We have room for you.That program is in some serious trouble. You’re coming off a season where you were ranked, finished with 8 wins, and have decent bowl in San Diego (vs Syracuse)?
That team should be proud they had such a great season. Instead, they are quickly abandoning ship to get away from the debt iceburg.
https://www.dnews.com/stories/washi...and-player-departures-in-recent-days-page_f96
That program is in some serious trouble. You’re coming off a season where you were ranked, finished with 8 wins, and have decent bowl in San Diego (vs Syracuse)?Things may not be going swimmingly for some schools in the PAC..
WSU in particular. They are floating reducing scholarships from 85 to 79 for football. If you were seeing great media projection numbers would you need to do things like that?
Working with kids takes some patience. It has been documented that Sid Green and Richie Adam's caused all sorts of problems for Tark back in the day. Sid Green led them to number 1 in the nation and Richie Adam's was conference player of the year. Also, Tarks dynasty was built a lot by transfers. The way CKK seems to roll, he would not put up with all kinds of guys that put UNLV on the map.Keyshawn was a huge ego/entitlement problem. If you can’t handle the ego or tame it, you’re better off letting him go, imo. He had talent, we saw it as a frosh. But you going to cater to his every demand?
No surprise. The two cal state schools with join at some point.
Looked to where he has transferred. He’s got zero views on where he’s at in 2024Keyshawn was a huge ego/entitlement problem. If you can’t handle the ego or tame it, you’re better off letting him go, imo. He had talent, we saw it as a frosh. But you going to cater to his every demand?
Lol, true!Man, these nicknames of bravado.
At least let them be nicknames that stand up consistently, against good competition.
It sounds really lame when the player is D2 or low D1 level.
Yeah if they win it does make us look better. That said we will be ranked in the 20s which I think is a legit ranking.100% i am.
Yes they are a traitor, yes they have become a bit of a rival.
But the are the the MW and G5 representative. Them winning pays UNLV. It also validates our season a bit more with how it played out.
So them winning 1 game which i think they have a punchers chance would be good. I cannot see them doing better than that
Third program in three years.Keyshawn was a huge ego/entitlement problem. If you can’t handle the ego or tame it, you’re better off letting him go, imo. He had talent, we saw it as a frosh. But you going to cater to his every demand?
They have 8 offensive rebounds to our 5 defensive rebounds. We would be very respectable if we could control our defensive board. We got no strong explosive leapers to help on boards this year. Whaley is missed very much.WERE GETTING OUTREBOUNDED BY A SMALLER TEAM! 3 POINT STREAK ENDING TODAY'!
The same argument could hold in regards to the Big and Indiana. Indiana didn't look good when they played top tier teams being Ohio State and Notre Dame. The Notre Dame game was really over at the half, and the final score was a lot closer than the game. As for how BSU will do, I have no clue?PSU is really physical, Boise hasn't played anyone this physical since Oregon. ACC did not deserve 2 teams in. I hate SEC, but S Carolina and Ole Miss better then Indiana, SMU, Clemson.
PSU offense is not great, QB is avg. I favor PSU by 7