ADVERTISEMENT

What do the ACC's new exit fees mean for the current negotiations with the PAC?

Historically, those media contracts are negotiated prior to them expiring, the B1G media rights expire after the 2029/30 season.

Now the language on leaving has been a little more specific once I found the data published beyond the paywall. It's 200 million to depart this year, and that number goes down by 15 million per year until AFTER the 2029/30 season where it drops to 75 million.

Now, there's nothing posted about them agreeing to leave the conference before then and exiting only when the the big drop off happens and the B1G including those new markets in their negotiations though I'm sure there's language in there to protect against that specifically. It looks like they're just protecting themselves from B1G expansion based on media contracts--the B1G obviously can afford to help them by giving them smaller shares for a few years as well or just outright--and there's some allure to the likes of Florida State, NC, and Clemson.

I'm really curious how this will end up affecting the bottom line for the MWC/PAC negotiations if at all--because this is the opposite of what we've seen so far for negotiating lower costs to get out of conference affiliation.
 


Looks like the ACC is playing extreme hardball to keep FSU, UNC, and Clemson home until the B1G contract is finalized. Will this have any bearing on the current mediation for the MWC exit/poaching fees?

Sorry I didn't link the actual article as it's paywalled.

Who knows. This stuff makes my head spin.

I think ultimately it all comes down to media rights revenue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RebelinWA
Historically, those media contracts are negotiated prior to them expiring, the B1G media rights expire after the 2029/30 season.

Now the language on leaving has been a little more specific once I found the data published beyond the paywall. It's 200 million to depart this year, and that number goes down by 15 million per year until AFTER the 2029/30 season where it drops to 75 million.

Now, there's nothing posted about them agreeing to leave the conference before then and exiting only when the the big drop off happens and the B1G including those new markets in their negotiations though I'm sure there's language in there to protect against that specifically. It looks like they're just protecting themselves from B1G expansion based on media contracts--the B1G obviously can afford to help them by giving them smaller shares for a few years as well or just outright--and there's some allure to the likes of Florida State, NC, and Clemson.

I'm really curious how this will end up affecting the bottom line for the MWC/PAC negotiations if at all--because this is the opposite of what we've seen so far for negotiating lower costs to get out of conference affiliation.

Every conference has upper/mid/bottom tiers.

In the G5/G6 the top teams hold out hopes for Power conference invites. The mid/bottom schools don't want to see them leave because it likely impacts the media deal down the road. Maybe I'm understanding this wrong and my hypothesis here is nonsense but.

Are we seeing the mid/bottom tier teams voting to raise exit fees in an attempt to hold things together for their own benefit by holding top teams hostage?

I mean UNLV/Memphis/Tulane of the world would all bolt regardless of exit fees to a power conference.

But if you are the AAC/MAC/CUSA you don't want to see your top schools bolt to another 'Group of' conference.

(Not sure that made sense or not)
 
UNLV to B1G confirmed... ACC stays together, we become travel partners with USC and UCLA...
Happy Comedy Central GIF by Awkwafina is Nora from Queens
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT