Sports bettors keep pretty solid information. He states that our class was ranked 134 (including transfers) and was our worst ranking ever.
Hopefully, our player development ranks #1 in the nation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One step forward, two steps back. I don't understand some of the comments that Arroyo's recruiting was not that great. We'll be starting at the bottom again because no matter how good our new coaches are at developing players, it takes time to do that.Yikes. I thought we were pretty solid. Thats downright disgusting.
I went and found it.
That gave me a flashback to the Hawkster days. Bobby would recruit kids that were big boned and hoped they would fill out. I remember one kid he recruited from a small Christian school on E. Bonanza. One of those wtf moments as I don't even think the school had a football team. He was allowed to be on a team from a school in his area.Odom got lots of smaller players who are hopefully able to fill out. He has his work cut out for sure.
The MWC Connection looks at us a little more favorably:I don't think this a great class, but I don't think it's 134th either.
Bingo.I think by the time you get down to the pool that the likes of UNLV recruits from there isnt much difference between 80 and 134. Is the 400th ranked LB better than #450?
I have no idea why they need 3?They must not have taken into account our three kickers.
Take that, P5’s !!!!
I think by the time you get down to the pool that the likes of UNLV recruits from there isnt much difference between 80 and 134. Is the 400th ranked LB better than #450?
Yea like what is the difference between the #100 RB in nation and #300 RB in nation? It gets really stupid and subjective. HS kids are all different. Some peak as total studs at 17 years old. Some don't even mature until 20.I think by the time you get down to the pool that the likes of UNLV recruits from there isnt much difference between 80 and 134. Is the 400th ranked LB better than #450?
To further your point, some are 17/18 when entering college and some are 19/20. Just like the basketball player from here about 10-12 years ago (I think) who was the lefty SG who played at Gorman and UCLA, then into the pros. He was talented, but he wasn't as great when matched against young men his age or older. He ended up being a pro, but not the impactful one many predicted.Yea like what is the difference between the #100 RB in nation and #300 RB in nation? It gets really stupid and subjective. HS kids are all different. Some peak as total studs at 17 years old. Some don't even mature until 20.