In the end, the Pac 12 departing programs will say it was a good choice and brand is better than $... but reality is they got suckered into a conference that's got bad leadership and will be grappling with realignment talks for the next 5-7 years, regardless of their commitments. Add in that basically OSU/WSU own all the power in the decision making and it's a mess... then you factor in 4 or 5 TV partners trying to fill holes in the schedule and you'll end up watching games in the middle of the week at like 4pm...
Could happen, I dont think it will untill FSU, Clemson, UNC, Duke, Miami and a few others bolt for the BIG and SEC, when it definitely will, but it could happen sooner?The absolute funniest thing that could happen would be for OSU and WSU to get a call from the ACC tomorrow who add them to give Cal and Stanford travel partners.
So my question is what would the media deal be had we reverse merged on Day 1, made a big ballyhoo about it, and so on?Some recent reads have said the media revenue would be under 10 million and as low as 7 million. This is just another read that projects under 10M.
"
The finances from a new TV deal are expected to be below what the league's consultants pitched schools initially. In the wake of the initial flurry of schools going to the league, ESPN reported schools were shown projected revenue from a TV deal north of $10 million per school, but conditions have changed.
That number projects under $10 million for the new deal starting in 2026 but is still expected to be more than those schools would have received had they remained in the Mountain West. The other financial variable is related to the buyouts for the five MW schools.
"
Still more than what we will get but in the case of BSU it's not much of an increase and actually the exit fees are going to sting for quite a while.
Could happen, I dont think it will untill FSU, Clemson, UNC, Duke, Miami and a few others bolt for the BIG and SEC, when it definitely will, but it could happen sooner?
So my question is what would the media deal be had we reverse merged on Day 1, made a big ballyhoo about it, and so on?
My $5 sez it would have been as good as the Pac-? is going to end up with. Minus all the penalties and lawyer fees, etc. Or the increased travel to new members. Oh wait, The Pac doesn't have those new members yet, who must be licking their chops at what they will want.
It would have been zero fanfare because it’s the pac leftovers downgrading into the MWC.So my question is what would the media deal be had we reverse merged on Day 1, made a big ballyhoo about it, and so on?
My $5 sez it would have been as good as the Pac-? is going to end up with. Minus all the penalties and lawyer fees, etc. Or the increased travel to new members. Oh wait, The Pac doesn't have those new members yet, who must be licking their chops at what they will want.
I agree with most of this. But if Boise spent all of that money for a $1m more a year payout (considering their sweetheart deal with the MW), people should be getting fired.A lot of factors here that are being overlooked.
First, this looks to be a bad deal for the PAC-2, no way to slice it, for everyone else though, still a pretty good move.
Say that the PAC-2 are worth 15 mil a piece. I believe it could be that high or higher, but I'm guessing most here do not. Either way if they were to join the MW. Worth that much it would raise the average payout 1.6 million a piece. that's it.
The base contract for the mountain west is 3.6. That's it. It gets raised to 5 with the CFP payout.
If the base for the new Pac 12 is 9, that is a huge win for the defectors. Plus the smaller conference gets more per team for the CFP bonus. The teams going to the CFP and the NCAAT get bigger shares. So a team like Boise can make much more in the new conference.
So look at the PAC 2, it really depends on these negotiations. I am guessing the traiterous teams will get at least some help on their exit fees. So they have to pony up for that. They have to pay whatever the poaching fee gets settled at.
But knowing Gloria, I would not be surprised that she demanded the "war chest" of the PAC 2 gets shared with a merger. In fact that is what I am guessing that is exactly what happened. Taking it on the chin with a 5.2 base media payout, having to share the CFP with more teams, and giving away their war chest vs building from scratch, risk paying up to 55 mil in poaching fees and whatever help they would have to do on other exit fees.
At least you can see where it makes some sense for them too. Still a bad situation for them, but you could see where it would still be better for them in the long run vs merging.
They didn't do it for the 1M...I agree with most of this. But if Boise spent all of that money for a $1m more a year payout (considering their sweetheart deal with the MW), people should be getting fired.
A lot of factors here that are being overlooked.
First, this looks to be a bad deal for the PAC-2, no way to slice it, for everyone else though, still a pretty good move.
Say that the PAC-2 are worth 15 mil a piece. I believe it could be that high or higher, but I'm guessing most here do not. Either way if they were to join the MW. Worth that much it would raise the average payout 1.6 million a piece. that's it.
The base contract for the mountain west is 3.6. That's it. It gets raised to 5 with the CFP payout.
If the base for the new Pac 12 is 9, that is a huge win for the defectors. Plus the smaller conference gets more per team for the CFP bonus. The teams going to the CFP and the NCAAT get bigger shares. So a team like Boise can make much more in the new conference.
So look at the PAC 2, it really depends on these negotiations. I am guessing the traiterous teams will get at least some help on their exit fees. So they have to pony up for that. They have to pay whatever the poaching fee gets settled at.
But knowing Gloria, I would not be surprised that she demanded the "war chest" of the PAC 2 gets shared with a merger. In fact that is what I am guessing that is exactly what happened. Taking it on the chin with a 5.2 base media payout, having to share the CFP with more teams, and giving away their war chest vs building from scratch, risk paying up to 55 mil in poaching fees and whatever help they would have to do on other exit fees.
At least you can see where it makes some sense for them too. Still a bad situation for them, but you could see where it would still be better for them in the long run vs merging.
You are way beyond generous for Gonzaga, USU and TX state. Gonzaga is basketball only, and they get to keep much of the money they bring in from basketball ($5 million at best only if they stay top 10-15 in basketball. USU would be at or near the bottom of the current MWC, so I would believe they would be more in the 2-3 million range, Texas State would most likely also be in that range. As for OSU and WSU, I do not believe they would be much over $10-12 million at best based on how quickly they are dropping off over the last couple of years. BSU is the only one I would probably increase to around $10+ million.15 mil x2 OSU/WSU
SDSU 8
BOISE 8
FSU 6
CSU 7
Gonzaga 5
USU 5 (Generous)
TX STATE 5 (Generous)
74 ÷ 9= 8.2 mil per.
USU is a distant 3rd in Utah so they can't have any type of national draw.
I don't know if those are right but they gotta be close.
To raise the valuation of each any higher then all remaining MWC were worth 1 million or less.
You are way beyond generous for Gonzaga, USU and TX state. Gonzaga is basketball only, and they get to keep much of the money they bring in from basketball ($5 million at best only if they stay top 10-15 in basketball. USU would be at or near the bottom of the current MWC, so I would believe they would be more in the 2-3 million range, Texas State would most likely also be in that range. As for OSU and WSU, I do not believe they would be much over $10-12 million at best based on how quickly they are dropping off over the last couple of years. BSU is the only one I would probably increase to around $10+ million.
Gonzaga negotiated their pay out to be equal to full member, reportedly. That has been out there for months.You are way beyond generous for Gonzaga, USU and TX state. Gonzaga is basketball only, and they get to keep much of the money they bring in from basketball ($5 million at best only if they stay top 10-15 in basketball. USU would be at or near the bottom of the current MWC, so I would believe they would be more in the 2-3 million range, Texas State would most likely also be in that range. As for OSU and WSU, I do not believe they would be much over $10-12 million at best based on how quickly they are dropping off over the last couple of years. BSU is the only one I would probably increase to around $10+ million.
I guess you are! We were talking about the value of each team to the overall PAC contract, and the fact the Gonzaga has no football team, and keeps most of their tournament money, drags down the overall value of the PAC. It has zero to do with any negotiated deal, so I think you are comparing apples to oranges. Or do you think Gonzaga is going to be worth $10-15 million to the PAC?Gonzaga negotiated their pay out to be equal to full member, reportedly. That has been out there for months.
Am I misunderstanding something about how that works?
Gonzaga negotiated their pay out to be equal to full member, reportedly. That has been out there for months.
Am I misunderstanding something about how that works?
I think Loco has it correct as well. The Gonzaga shit is just that - shit. They make a lot of money in their (admittedly high profile) non-con schedule, which will go 100% to them. And get to keep 1/2 of any NCAA BB credits. And share 100% in our FB revenues? They have to be getting up every morning and laugh at Teresa Ghoul (aka fool) and the PAC (aka Pathetic Asshat Clueless-ones).I guess you are! We were talking about the value of each team to the overall PAC contract, and the fact the Gonzaga has no football team, and keeps most of their tournament money, drags down the overall value of the PAC. It has zero to do with any negotiated deal, so I think you are comparing apples to oranges. Or do you think Gonzaga is going to be worth $10-15 million to the PAC?
To give them all that is pretty much the definition of desperation of the Pac. When Mark Few retires they will more than likely turn to shit. However, that pile of shit is going to make a lot of money while the rest of the Pac rubs their nutz and wonders what have we done.I think Loco has it correct as well. The Gonzaga shit is just that - shit. They make a lot of money in their (admittedly high profile) non-con schedule, which will go 100% to them. And get to keep 1/2 of any NCAA BB credits. And share 100% in our FB revenues? They have to be getting up every morning and laugh at Teresa Ghoul (aka fool) and the PAC (aka Pathetic Asshat Clueless-ones).
I think Loco has it correct as well. The Gonzaga shit is just that - shit. They make a lot of money in their (admittedly high profile) non-con schedule, which will go 100% to them. And get to keep 1/2 of any NCAA BB credits. And share 100% in our FB revenues? They have to be getting up every morning and laugh at Teresa Ghoul (aka fool) and the PAC (aka Pathetic Asshat Clueless-ones).