I want to see this entire agreement. Thet article also says: "For example, if the Pac-12 invited 10 Mountain West teams instead of all 12, it would owe the Mountain West a withdrawal fee of $122.5 million." Is that in the agreement itself? Doesn't really say.
Anyway, y'all know I am a big reverse merger fan. All of you, unless YOU want to kick someone(s) out. The thing about your comments, dcut, is if we rebuild the Pac with "some" of the MW, who else do we grab to fill the Pac roster? Another couple of G5 schools from hell's half acre? F that.
Oh yeah, did you guys notice that my Cougs are a half game out of 1st in the Pac-12, ranked 19 and being floated as a 5 seed? First NCAA in 16 years pretty much locked up. If we do win the league, it'll be the first since I believe 1941 when we were NCAA runners up.
SJSU definitely looks good at a glance. Huge market. They simply don't draw well. They don't travel particularly well either (neither do we).
I can see keeping UNM for reason you mentioned. But it's a really sparsely populated state. Not going to help any TV deals. In the event you wanted to keep them, I guess I would go and add NMSU as well and 'dominate' that state. It's not as heavily recruited state like Utah which is why I lean USU over UNM in an either or scenario.
Wyoming is a really tough call as well.
I guess it really comes down to how big do you want the conference to be initially. Start at 12 with eyes at expanding to 14 or 16? Or just jump in both feet and go to 16 immediately.
A lot might depend on Stanford/Cal and their decision with ACC. I don't think they would have to pay an exit fee if ACC crumbles.
I know you aren't big on expanding into Texas but personally if SMU were to become available, I would absolutely court them and UTSA to get into Texas market.
Purely from a football perspective and building a 16 team conference.
WSU
OSU
CAL
STANFORD
FRESNO
SDSU
BOISE STATE
CSU
UNLV
USU
SMU
UTSA
WYOMING
AF
SJSU (I'm contradicting myself here but it is hard to pass up that potential TV market. Plus MW and Pac both recruit Cal heavily obviously.
UNR or UNM
Again this is all about money, as every single part of conference realignment has been up to this point.
The Mw might be "doing fine" but there is a lot of financial dead weight. Really only the TV people really know this, perhaps the conference commissioners, but there are teams in the current MW that drop the per team compensation for sure. Which ones are the worst? We could guess. SJSU I would bet is one of them. Great market with practically zero penetration. UNM is the biggest market in a small state. Utah State is a far 3rd place in a small state.
I would guess the current MW plus markets are SDSU, CSU, Boise, Fresno State, and UNLV, and that may be it. Wyoming ( tiny market but near 100% penetration) do well for football, AFA somewhat small but has a bit of a national following, and UNR. The bottom 3 are Hawaii- good penetration of a tiny Market, UNM, and SJSU could easily be the lowest.
I think you don't build bigger than 12. Minimum requirement for a conference championship game for football. Leave room to expand. Even with 12 you are going to be forced to take teams that will hurt the bottom line, don't need more than necessary.
Again if it is about the bottom line, you have to kick the tires on a Texas School. Even if it is just for recruiting purposes. Tulane is a very good market but does stretch the footprint a bit much.
The remaining PAC schools are going to lose money from their previous contract. That is guaranteed. Do you want a 75% pay cut? A 50% pay cut? Would would you be willing to take if your company got bought out and couldn't pay you your salary?
I wonder what happens if several current MW schools decide they want to break away to form a new PAC. I could see a new TV negotiation go very similar to the previous PAC negotiations just due to the fact that the TV execs know that a break away is imminent. That could buy just enough time where the exit fees go down or get eliminated. Not sure what it would take to vote to blow up the current MW.
A new PAC could definitely get messy. But again you have to follow the money, it is the biggest driver for all of these decisions.