After the first game, I am clueless how UNLV will do verse Memphis. No doubt this is a must win if Kruger wants to have any chance to save his coaching job.UNLV 77
Memphis 69
I think he will be fine, regardless of the outcome of this game (thinking with head, not going by emotion).After the first game, I am clueless how UNLV will do verse Memphis. No doubt this is a must win if Kruger wants to have any chance to save his coaching job.
Coach Kruger, can beat Memphis and still get fired.After the first game, I am clueless how UNLV will do verse Memphis. No doubt this is a must win if Kruger wants to have any chance to save his coaching job.
And he can lose to Memphis and not get fired.Coach Kruger, can beat Memphis and still get fired.
Short term or long term being fine?I think he will be fine, regardless of the outcome of this game (thinking with head, not going by emotion).
But I really don’t have a clue what to expect either. This game serves as a barometer of sorts, the first one really didn’t.
I think there’s a chance that unless this season is a disaster, like 500 or worse, he may remain.Short term or long term being fine?
In order to progress as a school, it's what needs to happen.Doing that would piss off the remaining 200-300 diehards. But does that really matter in the grand scheme?
I do not think there is a chance in hell that he would remain if they dropped off to around 500 ball. Most fans are pissed off when they go 21-13, how do you think fans would react if the team dropped down to around 18-16?I think there’s a chance that unless this season is a disaster, like 500 or worse, he may remain.
Not saying that it’s what SHOULD happen.
What I’m saying is we don’t know what UNLV is thinking big picture. Funds are limited. Football is making money. It’s starting to drive things. Football needs to be fed. Basketball is “surviving” at bare bones minimum. It can continue to survive at bare bones minimum while we feed football more.
It’s essentially flopping football/hoops of the 80’s/90’s.
Again, not saying we should or that’s what UNLV is thinking. I’m saying people should at least consider it as a viable possibility.
Doing that would piss off the remaining 200-300 diehards. But does that really matter in the grand scheme?
I’d be pissed, you’d be pissed, most on this board would be pissed, half the people that attend games would be pissed.I do not think there is a chance in hell that he would remain if they dropped off to around 500 ball. Most fans are pissed off when they go 21-13, how do you think fans would react if the team dropped down to around 18-16?
Exactly, low overhead (his salary) … results are within margins (very low expectations now as compared to previously).In order to progress as a school, it's what needs to happen.
It was a slow process to move from the daily paper to the internet, but here we are. Football needs to catch up with the digital age, so to speak. This is why I see CKK remaining as a viable option. For the money we spend, we get the results we expect.
I think he can be replaced by a better coach for the same money or even less. Example: Danny Sprinkle was paid $ 185,000 at Montana State the year he left for Utah State. There are at least a dozen young, experienced and winning coaches who would come here for what CKK is getting.I’d be pissed, you’d be pissed, most on this board would be pissed, half the people that attend games would be pissed.
Really pissed. Demanding for a firing.
I agree with that.
So a large percentage of very low number would be pissed. A number so low that it doesn’t really matter. If we continue treading water as a mediocre program, what is going to happen? Attendance drop? We are at bare bones right now, any reduction in that doesn’t really hurt from where we are.
I’m saying the potential to focus on football as A, B, C and D is there for the first time in school history. If UNLV is serious about potential high line conference affiliations… it may require every single ounce of effort to go into the FB program.
Again, I’m not saying it’s the right thing to do, not saying UNLV is thinking it or even should think it … but trying to look at the potentials with a wider lens.
But he must have a constant green light. He's taking nearly half the shots of the entire team and his percentage is low.Former rebel Jackie Johnson has been killing it had 23 against St John
and had 18 and hit a gamer today against Seton Hall
Well, that’s one of those things that could happen if UNLV decided to tread water while not costing a ton. But if UNLV were to look at it that way … there’d be some local influence against it and the argument of continuing with slow growth AND maintaining continuity would come into play.I think he can be replaced by a better coach for the same money or even less. Example: Danny Sprinkle was paid $ 185,000 at Montana State the year he left for Utah State. There are at least a dozen young, experienced and winning coaches who would come here for what CKK is getting.