They had requested an extension for 30 days to avoid paying the new exit free. The conference said no.
For sure. I don't fault them for trying at all. However, it could also take away some of their bargaining power or leverage if they're not in a league at all. I guess they could try to go independent or join the WAC of WCC if needed short term.Pretty entitled move by them.
Devils advocate though….they’d get thrashed internally if they did not try this - people are saying the MW is a business and they shouldn’t cave - true - SDSU is a business too and you have to apply the same logic - both sides are looking to make their bottom line look better
If they don't get in we'll take them back and keep their money.For sure. I don't fault them for trying at all. However, it could also take away some of their bargaining power or leverage if they're not in a league at all. I guess they could try to go independent or join the WAC of WCC if needed short term.
LOL, that would be great.If they don't get in we'll take them back and keep their money.
This letter was to serve as a written notice of intent to leave the conference. The part that gets me is the "unforeseen delays involving other collegiate athletic conferences beyond our control"I read something saying its not their official withdrawal yet, but their request for additional time to decide if they want to withdraw. Not sure if accurate though. They think they'll be getting a Pac 12 invite, but with the Pac media rights taking so long, its all still up in the air. Will Colorado leave? Arizona? If not, will the Pac still offer to bring in SDSU? Lots still up in the air
Jealous as hell. Hope they do well. F*cking UNLV...They had requested an extension for 30 days to avoid paying the new exit free. The conference said no.
Hell ya. Make them pay the exit fee to leave. Fck those guys. While we are at it why not just remove them from the upcoming seasons sports schedules. They can play with their dyks for a year before someone lets them join a conference.If they don't get in we'll take them back and keep their money.
They aren’t stupid. Something has to iron clad or close to it. You don’t just “jump” without knowing something. Or they are dumber than UNLV has been for decades. One or the other.Hell ya. Make them pay the exit fee to leave. Fck those guys. While we are at it why not just remove them from the upcoming seasons sports schedules. They can play with their dyks for a year before someone lets them join a conference.
I see it differently.Jealous as hell. Hope they do well. F*cking UNLV...
Just like what I had said. I want to see the letter. Ziegler also said that the MWC is going to have to meet to discuss this. It doesn't sound like this has been resolved.
Play the victim. “It should be us, no fair, screw them, why do they get the breaks?”You know being a fan is rough when you are consumed with the on goings of your adversaries - we are talking about SDSU - lol and their conference affiliation- One person called them
"entitled"... LMFAO. When one needs to improve: They need not look at what "others" are doing - This is a time "to look within" ....UNLV and its fan base needs to do some soul searching
Anyone who “can” is looking around. Certain schools cannot, they are stuck. I wouldn’t call us a long shot but we are one of the ones that can. We’ve been looking for a long time. At one point many moons ago, I was hearing an AAC merger. The P-12 talks were always weak when the P-12 was at its best, wasn’t going to happen there. The B12 has always been more likely than the B12 (with older alignments), imo. But no real strong traction for any, yet.Genius negotiation move by the MW. They are not stupid…they did not interpret SDSU incorrectly. The fully understand what’s happening and have control of SDSU’s future because of how little time is left. By “misinterpreting”, they’re forcing more time to be wasted. SDSU has to react with a follow up letter or else they risk the MW thinking they’re out. Can’t call that bluff. Massive intentional waste of the by MW in order to cause more anxiety for SDSU.
Does UNLV feel the same way? Can UNLV goes independent and schedule some serious competition? I think so...This would be a big gamble. And this is still Vegas.The PAC needs schools, the question is how many and if there will even be a PAC. I still think the PAC will lose UO, UW for sure and then at least 4 more out of UA, ASU, CU, UU, Stanford and Cal.
I’d think worst case scenario for SDSU is they’d play a year as an independent.
yeesh, talk about a gamble.Does UNLV feel the same way? Can UNLV goes independent and schedule some serious competition? I think so...This would be a big gamble. And this is still Vegas.
If we think we have the right people in the right position, what the hell are we afraid of? Let's do this really. No more lips service.
For me, I'll be happy if they can find a way to win one more game than they lose.Tired of waiting for the ball to drop
I don't see how trying to go independent could help us in any way at this point.
You can probably add Stanford and Cal to the leftovers from the Pac 12 as well!Going independent would be detrimental to UNLV. My point above about SDSU was they had to make a decision that could have cost them a lot of $$. They will be asked to join a current P5 conference, its just a matter of if its this summer or next, the question isnt if its which one, and what that conference looks like when SDSU gets there. My thoughts are its a decimated PAC which will end up inviting several other current MWC and end up looking a lot like the MWC with a couple let over (OSU,WSU) PAC schools.
Maybe but I have a hard time believing Stanford is left behind.You can probably add Stanford and Cal to the leftovers from the Pac 12 as well!
Now this would be interestingHow about a 14 team West Division (Big 10) including all the current PAC 12 teams and SDSU + (?).
Going independent would be detrimental to UNLV. My point above about SDSU was they had to make a decision that could have cost them a lot of $$. They will be asked to join a current P5 conference, its just a matter of if its this summer or next, the question isnt if its which one, and what that conference looks like when SDSU gets there. My thoughts are its a decimated PAC which will end up inviting several other current MWC and end up looking a lot like the MWC with a couple let over (OSU,WSU) PAC schools.
I don't know that is a lot of teams.How about a 14 team West Division (Big 10) including all the current PAC 12 teams and SDSU + (?).
At this point, it seems like maybe they'll stay in the MWC, IMO. The PAC 12 media deal doesn't look like it's going to be very good, but it hasn't been officially released yet to its TBD. They'd need to be able to have enough cash to float 2-3 years IMO, to pay off the MWC buyout, if the PAC media deal isn't that great. Not sure what their financial situation is, but based on their request to pay the MWC off over multiple years, I'm not sure if they'll want to take on that liability or not.
Because if they bail now, and don't end up getting invited into the PAC, then they still have to pay out the MWC, don't get any PAC money, and will be independent until they get in somewhere else. Even if they do get into the PAC, but at a lesser media deal, it still may take them a few years to recoup the buyout fee. Even more so if they wait and have to pay double.At this point, it seems like maybe they'll stay in the MWC, IMO. The PAC 12 media deal doesn't look like it's going to be very good, but it hasn't been officially released yet to its TBD. They'd need to be able to have enough cash to float 2-3 years IMO, to pay off the MWC buyout, if the PAC media deal isn't that great. Not sure what their financial situation is, but based on their request to pay the MWC off over multiple years, I'm not sure if they'll want to take on that liability or not.