My 5 favorite NCAAfb teams for the next 3 weeks.....

[reagan21]

1. UNLV
2. Wyoming
3. Fresno
4. Utah State
5. Miami

We need those Rams to take a loss, two would be better.

....or....

Boise to drop the next 2 and we win out.

I'd love to be in that MWC championship game again. Regardless, we will be playing in December.

#GoKings

 

[Boston Rebel 2]

1. UNLV
2. Wyoming
3. Fresno
4. Utah State
5. Miami

We need those Rams to take a loss, two would be better.

....or....

Boise to drop the next 2 and we win out.

I'd love to be in that MWC championship game again. Regardless, we will be playing in December.

#GoKings

Was thinking it would be FSU but they have been playing so badly lately. CSU is so lucky with that schedule we would beat them 10 times out of 10.

 

[lvrebalum2012]

I still think (and am really hoping) that Wyoming will challenge them this week. It's a rivalry game and I'm sure the pokes would love to ruin CSU's run to the MWC championship game.

Most important thing for us is to keep winning!

 

[reagan21]

Most important thing for us is to keep winning!

yep. That's all the Rebels can control. @SJSU is going to be a tough W. Finish 10-2 and 7-1 in conference and just let the chips fall where they may.

 

[Rebel1986]

1. UNLV
2. Wyoming
3. Fresno
4. Utah State
5. Miami

We need those Rams to take a loss, two would be better.

....or....

Boise to drop the next 2 and we win out.

I'd love to be in that MWC championship game again. Regardless, we will be playing in December.

#GoKings

My preference is to be playing in January!!!!!!

 

[InZoneU]

We are 0-4 and 2-8 vs. SJSU in recent games. We have also lost 4 out of last 5 vs. SDSU.

Both of these programs completely and totally own us.

 

[Mojo702]

If CSU loses one, what's the tiebreaker between them and us?

 

[lvrebalum2012]

If CSU loses one, what's the tiebreaker between them and us?

My understanding is this:

1st Tiebreaker: head-head results (none in this case, we didn't play eachother)
2nd tiebreaker: highest team in the CFP rankings (if we win out, there is a good chance we are top 25 in the CFP rankings)
3rd tiebreaker: overall winning percentage
4th tiebreaker: record against next highest placed team

 

[1Tripoda]

My understanding is this:

1st Tiebreaker: head-head results (none in this case, we didn't play eachother)
2nd tiebreaker: highest team in the CFP rankings (if we win out, there is a good chance we are top 25 in the CFP rankings)
3rd tiebreaker: overall winning percentage
4th tiebreaker: record against next highest placed team

Does the SOS adds to that as well?

 

[j. spilotro]

We are 0-4 and 2-8 vs. SJSU in recent games. We have also lost 4 out of last 5 vs. SDSU.

Both of these programs completely and totally own us.

(Lately) Other than UNR, most teams own UNLV to some degree, I’d think. I don’t know off the top of my head H2H against conference foes the past 5-10 years, but when you’re winning 2 or 3 only, most teams are going to own you.

 

[WYNN or Dye]

We are 0-4 and 2-8 vs. SJSU in recent games. We have also lost 4 out of last 5 vs. SDSU.

Both of these programs completely and totally own us.

That, was with Tony Sanchez and Marcus Arroyo.
UNLV, didn't play SDSU last year and Barry Odom lost to SJSU once.
Looking, to go 2-0 versus those two teams, this year.

 

[rebel5280]

We are 0-4 and 2-8 vs. SJSU in recent games. We have also lost 4 out of last 5 vs. SDSU.

Both of these programs completely and totally own us.

And add to it our offense has been suspect a lot of the time in the last few games and we could be in a dog fight in all 3 remaining games. Between Marion’s lack of imagination and Hajj crashing back to earth, we just don’t know what this team will do because of our suspect offensive unit!

 

[InZoneU]

(Lately) Other than UNR, most teams own UNLV to some degree, I’d think. I don’t know off the top of my head H2H against conference foes the past 5-10 years, but when you’re winning 2 or 3 only, most teams are going to own you.

I agree. We shouldn't be looking past either of these teams as easy wins.