Why did Zimm not come out after halftime?
There were some lineup combinations we may not see again. Pat M. has been great, but isn't a true point guard. Much better at the 2 or 3. Zimm was starting to heat up when he went out. Guys just got back from three straight days of games and travel. Add that to guys being sick it was pretty easy to predict an uneven performance.With Zimm out most of game, GL gone, and Jerome out sick I think we did just fine. Sure we struggled defensively in first half but in 2nd half we cranked it up and ran them ragged. Also some of the lineups we put out there because of injury or illness hadn't lined up together before tonight for meaningful minutes
Liked what Green brought to the team. Scouting reports made him seem a little one dimensional. He actually was a little more athletic than I anticipated.Agree, I think at one point we had Jones, Posyer, McCaw, Green, and I think Morgan on the floor at the same time... I doubt we see that again if ever... But hey it worked, although not ideal.. Also agree Green getting a good run of minutes and points shook off some rust and got him up to speed a bit...
Pat M. has been great, but isn't a true point guard. Much better at the 2 or 3.
No argument from me, it just isn't his best position. I think over the course of an entire season I would rather have Seagears run the point. Pat has improved a lot from last year to this year with ball handling/court awareness. If Seagears were to go for a long stretch we would be ok with Pat at that spot. Would rather have Pat run it than Cook.McCaw might be better at the 2 or 3, but he is more than capable of running point.
[QUOTE="Bullmastiff 1, post: 129068, member: 828"
Would rather have Pat run it than Cook.