ADVERTISEMENT

CBS Sports Way to early top 25

I think the only tweak we see next year is to revamp the seeding process, which I think is completely warranted.
I believe I read that any changes have to be agreed on by 100% of the committee members. Do you think the ACC/Big 12/MW representatives will agree to that? Or want to keep it how it is?
 
I think the only tweak we see next year is to revamp the seeding process, which I think is completely warranted.
I agree. They might change seeding process but also after this years CFP, do you really want a bye week? Id argue Id rather have a full Allegiant stadium as the G5 champion reward and then play the next games in whatever Bowls are there...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
We aren't even in consideration for ESPN's way too early to 25, they have Boise in theirs though.
Call me a hater, but I see a drop off in Boise coming due to the loss of their OC more than just losing Jeanty... losing that amount of experience and game planning isnt easily replaced and you cant just plug and play RBs thinking that they'll turn into Ashton.
 
Call me a hater, but I see a drop off in Boise coming due to the loss of their OC more than just losing Jeanty... losing that amount of experience and game planning isnt easily replaced and you cant just plug and play RBs thinking that they'll turn into Ashton.
They got the Fresno RB, right? I'm not sure if he's expected to be their #1, but I'd think so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bullmastiff 1
I agree. They might change seeding process but also after this years CFP, do you really want a bye week? Id argue Id rather have a full Allegiant stadium as the G5 champion reward and then play the next games in whatever Bowls are there...
I think that they should change the seeding process as follows. The top four conference champions are guaranteed a seed no worse than #6. Then, Utah could have a home game against UNLV in the first round of the playoffs in 2025 :) !
 
They got the Fresno RB, right? I'm not sure if he's expected to be their #1, but I'd think so.
I know they’re considered good … but even when they beat us two years ago. I didn’t like Keane nor Sherrod. They didn’t suck, they were fine … but I wouldn’t want either to be the #1. But a big part of a runner is the O line, maybe he will thrive there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
I think that they should change the seeding process as follows. The top four conference champions are guaranteed a seed no worse than #6. Then, Utah could have a home game against UNLV in the first round of the playoffs in 2025 :) !
Utah should have a home and home vs UNLV. Yeah, we're down in playing the Utes in the CFP. That would be UNLV first CFP and look like a win. :)
 
They got the Fresno RB, right? I'm not sure if he's expected to be their #1, but I'd think so.

It's easy to say 'It was all Jeanty', but you bring up a bigger point. Dirk K. is a very very good OC.

Some guys are good play designers but don't have great feel for when to call stuff. Dirk was good at both. I think Boise falls off a bit this year with the loss of both Dirk and Jeanty. But Madsen is a very good QB..Boise should be favorite to win MWC again.
 
It's easy to say 'It was all Jeanty', but you bring up a bigger point. Dirk K. is a very very good OC.

Some guys are good play designers but don't have great feel for when to call stuff. Dirk was good at both. I think Boise falls off a bit this year with the loss of both Dirk and Jeanty. But Madsen is a very good QB..Boise should be favorite to win MWC again.


Interesting to see that UNLV seems to be getting all of the G5 love. Its cool, but we are going to have a brand new team practically with a brand new coach. Boise is losing some key pieces, but you would still think that they would be the favorite.

UNLV has done well with the portal, but the majority of the players we have landed are a bit unproven.

I know the fact that we have CDM is driving this heavily, which makes some sense. But it is still interesting to me with so many questions on what our team will be next year.

Picking Boise seems to be the safer pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
It's easy to say 'It was all Jeanty', but you bring up a bigger point. Dirk K. is a very very good OC.

Some guys are good play designers but don't have great feel for when to call stuff. Dirk was good at both. I think Boise falls off a bit this year with the loss of both Dirk and Jeanty. But Madsen is a very good QB..Boise should be favorite to win MWC again.
Was* a good OC. Dude retired.
 
Interesting to see that UNLV seems to be getting all of the G5 love. Its cool, but we are going to have a brand new team practically with a brand new coach. Boise is losing some key pieces, but you would still think that they would be the favorite.

UNLV has done well with the portal, but the majority of the players we have landed are a bit unproven.

I know the fact that we have CDM is driving this heavily, which makes some sense. But it is still interesting to me with so many questions on what our team will be next year.

Picking Boise seems to be the safer pick.
Iron sharpens Iron... Lots of talented guys going to be pushing for playing time. Some with huge chips on their shoulders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
Interesting to see that UNLV seems to be getting all of the G5 love. Its cool, but we are going to have a brand new team practically with a brand new coach. Boise is losing some key pieces, but you would still think that they would be the favorite.

UNLV has done well with the portal, but the majority of the players we have landed are a bit unproven.

I know the fact that we have CDM is driving this heavily, which makes some sense. But it is still interesting to me with so many questions on what our team will be next year.

Picking Boise seems to be the safer pick.
Something tells me we'll only recognize a couple of names on this roster after spring practice. Hoping it works out. I wish there was a little bit more continuity with this roster, but that's wishful thinking. Overhauls are the new normal now for every program.
 
Something tells me we'll only recognize a couple of names on this roster after spring practice. Hoping it works out. I wish there was a little bit more continuity with this roster, but that's wishful thinking. Overhauls are the new normal now for every program.

This is true. But we were pretty busy in the portal last year. With Odom leaving and taking guys and other guys opting out it created a situation where we had to be even busier this year with a lot more spots to fill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
Iron sharpens Iron... Lots of talented guys going to be pushing for playing time. Some with huge chips on their shoulders.
True, but we are running with mostly guys with potential, without a lot of playing time.

There are lots of reasons to be hopeful, but at the same time, it is a little crazy that we are getting so much preseason love.

Sure Boise lost 2 very important pieces, but they didn't lose their entire team. They have a good culture and a coach that has done well.

It is easier now than ever, but it is still tough to rebuild a football team from scratch in one year. I mean Deion crushed it in the portal that first year, and did improve drastically over the previous season, but they were just mediocre.

Mullen is a better coach, but still.

I do think our schedule is in our favor. Looks to be a bit easier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
True, but we are running with mostly guys with potential, without a lot of playing time.

There are lots of reasons to be hopeful, but at the same time, it is a little crazy that we are getting so much preseason love.

Sure Boise lost 2 very important pieces, but they didn't lose their entire team. They have a good culture and a coach that has done well.

It is easier now than ever, but it is still tough to rebuild a football team from scratch in one year. I mean Deion crushed it in the portal that first year, and did improve drastically over the previous season, but they were just mediocre.

Mullen is a better coach, but still.

I do think our schedule is in our favor. Looks to be a bit easier.
Agreed. Lots of potential, not much proof. However, a lot of our previous transfers here were similar. Overall, the 2 best resume transfers were probably Catalon and Grimes, and they were definitely big impact guys for UNLV last season.

Ricky White had a small amount of success, but also not a ton of stats. His freshman year at Michigan State, he had 10 receptions for 223 yards and 1 TD. Those came in only 3 games though, with most of that occurring in 1 game vs Michigan.

Jackson Woodard had a total of 16 tackles in his 3 seasons at Arkansas. No sacks, FF, Int, etc. He was considered a 0 star transfer.

Jalon Catalon was a proven commodity, but injuries really slowed him down, to where he only played in 9 games his previous 2 seasons with a combined 25 tackles, 0 sacks, 0 INT's, in those 2 years at TX and Arkansas.

Tony Grimes was a solid player at UNC, but didn't play in 2023 due to injury.

Most of the other transfers were either smaller school guys or players that didn't get a lot of PT at their schools.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT