I agree 100% .... I'm fine with alternate uniforms, as I know many players love them, and so do alot of fans. One pet peeve of mine is when alternate uniforms do not have any of the schools main colors included.
Another pet peeve is when schools with very, very, very distinguishable uniforms and logo's start drastically messing around with the uni's and logo's. Schools like Oklahoma, USC, Florida State, Ohio State, Notre Dame, Alabama and Texas. Obviously, this is not an issue at all for UNLV, as many people have no clue what UNLV football uni's look like, and UNLV does not have much in the way of tradition with football. And,
I know not all of the schools mentioned have drastically altered their uniforms, helmets and/or logo's. A few have though, including Notre Dame for some of their "special" games, or whatever term they use. Ohio State has done a very good job of modernizing their look, while staying true to the Scarlet and Grey. At least to me, the schools mentioned above and possibly a few others have logo's, uni's and helmets that are very, very, very distinguishable, and that is part of what makes those programs special.
Also, let's not fool ourselves. While the alternate uniforms are used to help draw in recruits, they are used just as much to try and make $$$$$ for the schools. To make the money, it helps to have a winning program. And, no matter what the uniforms, winning also helps with landing higher caliber athletes/players. In the end, no matter how "sweet" or "sick" the uniforms, it still comes back to wins and losses.