Yeah PSU didn’t say to themselves hey let’s allow Boise to drive down the field and get within a field goal at the start of the 4th quarter. Boise actually had more yards but they couldn’t seal the deal with two missed FG’s and a TD called back. That called back TD they stopped them three and out and drove down for a FG. At that point it should have been a tied game but they made too many mistakes. PSU clearly better but it wasn’t a blowout name your score as some are saying. That was the SMU game.
Boise definitely weathered the initial storm and then outplayed PSU for a good chunk of that game. They were moving the ball and limiting PSU to short drives. They just kept shooting themselves in the foot and couldn't convert when they needed to.
Penn State was the better team, that is for sure, but it was a competitive game.
It felt a lot like the Peach bowl. Similar lopsided start, with it changing momentum. except ASU was converting drives, converting 4th downs, and able to finally start punching it in, Boise couldn't quite get there.
That with ASU nearly pulling off the upset, and Oregon getting boatraced, I don't think there is enough evidence to totally change the rules because obviously the current format is broken.
Those "poor" teams that had to play that first round with big homefield advantages that all won their games and used that momentum for the quarterfinals, did just fine.
I still like rewarding conference champions, with giving superconferences that small disadvantage for chasing the money of the Big 2.