State workers not covered by SS still pay in to Medicare.Followup Q - so does a state/local non-SS person who doesn't have 10 years of credit elsewhere get Medicare at 65?
State workers not covered by SS still pay in to Medicare.Followup Q - so does a state/local non-SS person who doesn't have 10 years of credit elsewhere get Medicare at 65?
Got it, thanks.State workers not covered by SS still pay in to Medicare.
No. There was a time. I've been around for a while. When there were employees in the City that did not pay into Medicare. I don't know about the other government agencies in Nevada back then but, for the City I know that first hand. It was even grandfathered to where once you started without paying into Medicare you never had to pay. Therefore, you are not eligible to get Medicare. There are SS/Medicare rules where a spouse, not eligible, can get into Medicare if their husband/wife is eligible. But, because there was no SS paid that spouse has to pay their own quarterly Medicare premiums. Does that make sense?Followup Q - so does a state/local non-SS person who doesn't have 10 years of credit elsewhere get Medicare at 65?
Taken from GROK AINo. There was a time. I've been around for a while. When there were employees in the City that did not pay into Medicare. I don't know about the other government agencies in Nevada back then but, for the City I know that first hand. It was even grandfathered to where once you started without paying into Medicare you never had to pay. Therefore, you are not eligible to get Medicare. There are SS/Medicare rules where a spouse, not eligible, can get into Medicare if their husband/wife is eligible. But, because there was no SS paid that spouse has to pay their own quarterly Medicare premiums. Does that make sense?
Exactly. (see the part underlined). There was a time when no SS and no Medicare taken out of the pay check. Both were grandfathered and never had to make those payments when new hires had to. There is a downside and an upside. I mentioned the downside in the previous post. The upside was that you could retire with PERS at 90% of what your last 3 highest years average was. Currently, unless things have changed since I left, it is 75%.Taken from GROK AI
Yes, employees who opt out of Social Security (SS) still typically pay into Medicare, as the two programs are funded through separate payroll taxes. In the U.S., the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax has two components: one for Social Security (6.2% of wages up to a cap) and one for Medicare (1.45% with no cap). Employers match these contributions.
Certain employees—such as some state and local government workers hired before specific dates or members of certain religious groups—can be exempt from Social Security if their employer has an approved alternative plan or exemption (e.g., under Section 218 agreements or IRS rules for religious exemptions). However, Medicare taxes are mandatory for nearly all workers, regardless of Social Security participation. The Medicare portion of FICA applies unless a very specific exemption exists, which is rare and usually tied to narrow historical or legal exceptions (e.g., certain pre-1986 hires not covered by Medicare agreements).
yes.Followup Q - so does a state/local non-SS person who doesn't have 10 years of credit elsewhere get Medicare at 65?
My sources say DEI and other related policies were a large emphasis on the faculty.Well when you still support DEI, and invited a propaganda wing of a terrorist organization in and pledge to keep working with them I’d say it’s time to go.
That's a lot. In Washington, it's 2%/year of service, based on your best 5 years, up to 60% (30 years). Although I guess if that 75% includes what would have been SS, sounds a little more comparable. Digressing, I took my SS at 62. Monkey math told me that if I waited until 67, I would "breakeven" aka start regretting it at 78. +/- earnings on the other retirement that I don't have to draw yet. At 65 my little PERS pension will kick in.Exactly. (see the part underlined). There was a time when no SS and no Medicare taken out of the pay check. Both were grandfathered and never had to make those payments when new hires had to. There is a downside and an upside. I mentioned the downside in the previous post. The upside was that you could retire with PERS at 90% of what your last 3 highest years average was. Currently, unless things have changed since I left, it is 75%.
I've been on Medicare for quite a few years and, if I can give you some advice, please go see a broker that represents all of the different types of Medicare programs including traditional and the Advantage programs. Don't go to one that only covers the advantage programs. While less expensive, advantage programs have distinct drawbacks.That's a lot. In Washington, it's 2%/year of service, based on your best 5 years, up to 60% (30 years). Although I guess if that 75% includes what would have been SS, sounds a little more comparable. Digressing, I took my SS at 62. Monkey math told me that if I waited until 67, I would "breakeven" aka start regretting it at 78. +/- earnings on the other retirement that I don't have to draw yet. At 65 my little PERS pension will kick in.
On the Medicare posts, I will be turning 65 soon and am looking forward to Medicare. Got some research to do. Being early retired, I paid $1,000/month last year for health/dental vision insurance.
As a healthcare provider I can attest to this.While less expensive, advantage programs have distinct drawbacks.
Maybe I need to go back to work for UNLV. I think I only needed 3 more years for PERS.UNLV employee designations are academic Faculty, Administrative Faculty and classified employees
Employees do not pay in to SS
Employees in the classified and who worked prior to a certain year are in PERS and will get a pension
Non classified have 17.5% pretax deducted and placed into a retirement account managed by TIAA. The 17.5 is matched by the university so you have 35% going into a retirement account
Hope that helps