I think we lead by 20 with 2-minutes left then the MWC refs remember that they need all the best NET rated teams to win.
Idaho 72
UNLV 66
Idaho 72
UNLV 66
If we didn’t get ROBBED, we’d be in a tie for first place right now, with the toughest 5 game start in conference play.Big win on the road. Should be 3-1 in conf right now. I have a feeling that USU game is going to piss me off all season.
Thanks for getting me angrier lolIf we didn’t get ROBBED, we’d be in a tie for first place right now, with the toughest 5 game start in conference play.
Like I said.Rebs will play tough tonight. They won't forget what happened.
Tough, gritty win for the team. Web, Whaley, and LuRod came to play. Did Whaley threw that ball to the ref's nuts by accident? It seems like that ref hates UNLV.Like I said.
Lil Boone has been a fouling machine. Plays aggressively, so the fouls are understood at times, but also reaches for other fouls.Another dumb foul by Boone!
Watch our shooting in Conference and tough games. We need to shoot close to 35% or higher from three to win.It is hard to figure UNLV. They easily beat New Mexico, then lose a close game to Utah State at home, then they go into a touch Boise State arena and pull out a win. Now the same New Mexico that UNLV easily beat is up by 11 over Utah State.
Or get Robert Whaley to throw more basketball and crush that ref's nuts. Some Ticky tacky calls by that one ref.Watch our shooting in Conference and tough games. We need to shoot close to 35% or higher from three to win.
I am pretty confident that we have the ability to beat anyone in the conference, especially in a tournament setting outside of SDSU.Am I stupid for thinking this team could win the conference tournament? I do think we'd need SDSU to get upset prior to playing us but I'm much more optimistic about this team now than I was 5 games ago.
This team hasn’t shown at all this season that they can win consistently. Certainly not consistent enough to win a tournament. If they can rip off 3-5 wins in a row, I’ll feel more confident.Am I stupid for thinking this team could win the conference tournament? I do think we'd need SDSU to get upset prior to playing us but I'm much more optimistic about this team now than I was 5 games ago.
I think the potential is there but that potential is there for about 7 teams in conference.This team hasn’t shown at all this season that they can win consistently. Certainly not consistent enough to win a tournament. If they can rip off 3-5 wins in a row, I’ll feel more confident.
What’s going to happen is the same thing we’ve done for 2 seasons under CKK, sitting around saying “man we’re right there, if only we did x,y,z we’d be playing in the NIT or whatever.”
^^^^^This^^^ Truth!This team hasn’t shown at all this season that they can win consistently. Certainly not consistent enough to win a tournament. If they can rip off 3-5 wins in a row, I’ll feel more confident.
What’s going to happen is the same thing we’ve done for 2 seasons under CKK, sitting around saying “man we’re right there, if only we did x,y,z we’d be playing in the NIT or whatever.”
SDSU is more beatable than they’ve been in a few seasons. I do think they are a semi-difficult matchup, but not as much as before. It all counts, but we probably outplayed SDSU for 30 minutes at their place, it was the terrible jack it up from all over the court offense at the beginning that made it difficult to get over any hump.I am pretty confident that we have the ability to beat anyone in the conference, especially in a tournament setting outside of SDSU.
SDSU is just a bad match up, not impossible, but I am much less optiimistic with them.
WE can beat the Aztecs -I am pretty confident that we have the ability to beat anyone in the conference, especially in a tournament setting outside of SDSU.
SDSU is just a bad match up, not impossible, but I am much less optiimistic with them.
Overall the season has not been consistent at all. Especially early on, but you can argue that they have been pretty consistent since the Creighton game.This team hasn’t shown at all this season that they can win consistently. Certainly not consistent enough to win a tournament. If they can rip off 3-5 wins in a row, I’ll feel more confident.
What’s going to happen is the same thing we’ve done for 2 seasons under CKK, sitting around saying “man we’re right there, if only we did x,y,z we’d be playing in the NIT or whatever.”
We have definitely turned a corner lately.Overall the season has not been consistent at all. Especially early on, but you can argue that they have been pretty consistent since the Creighton game.
St Mary's was a tough loss, but close. A quad 1 loss isn't the worst thing.
2 meaningless games, but then a tough quad 1 loss at SDSU, where yes they came out awful but fought back.
Quad 1 home win against UNM,
A should be quad 1 home win against USU, still not a bad loss
Then a quad 1 road win at Boise.
We are 3 points away from being 5-1 in quad 1 right now. Which is objectively very very good.
As it is 3-3 is not bad.
we still have 5 quad 1 opportunities to go.
Which brings up the question. Should this matter?
I say it should.
Yes every game does count, and bad early losses could easily take away a post season.
But if this staff brings together a team at the end of the season that is legit good, shouldn't that count? Well if the goal is to see if CKK can bring together a good team, late is better than never. Especially in year 3 of the contract for a rookie head coach. It doesn't mean you extend him, but it may buy another year.
Personally I think it is way better than previous teams that started strong and fell apart down the stretch. Yes, like last year.
If we finish top 4 in this league, which totally looks to be doable ( that is more than 1 more loss BTW) I think he should stay. It would be the best league finish in quite some time. In the best the league has been top to bottom since BYU left. Arguably better.
I think we can do better than KK. I don't believe he can consistently get us in the top two/three of our league - much less have a National impact. You have to consider the entire year. We weren't prepared for the first 10 games.Overall the season has not been consistent at all. Especially early on, but you can argue that they have been pretty consistent since the Creighton game.
St Mary's was a tough loss, but close. A quad 1 loss isn't the worst thing.
2 meaningless games, but then a tough quad 1 loss at SDSU, where yes they came out awful but fought back.
Quad 1 home win against UNM,
A should be quad 1 home win against USU, still not a bad loss
Then a quad 1 road win at Boise.
We are 3 points away from being 5-1 in quad 1 right now. Which is objectively very very good.
As it is 3-3 is not bad.
we still have 5 quad 1 opportunities to go.
Which brings up the question. Should this matter?
I say it should.
Yes every game does count, and bad early losses could easily take away a post season.
But if this staff brings together a team at the end of the season that is legit good, shouldn't that count? Well if the goal is to see if CKK can bring together a good team, late is better than never. Especially in year 3 of the contract for a rookie head coach. It doesn't mean you extend him, but it may buy another year.
Personally I think it is way better than previous teams that started strong and fell apart down the stretch. Yes, like last year.
If we finish top 4 in this league, which totally looks to be doable ( that is more than 1 more loss BTW) I think he should stay. It would be the best league finish in quite some time. In the best the league has been top to bottom since BYU left. Arguably better.
This!I think we can do better than KK. I don't believe he can consistently get us in the top two/three of our league - much less have a National impact. You have to consider the entire year. We weren't prepared for the first 10 games.
We all here think he wasn't truly seasoned enough to get the job.I think we can do better than KK. I don't believe he can consistently get us in the top two/three of our league - much less have a National impact. You have to consider the entire year. We weren't prepared for the first 10 games.
I tend to agree with this. I’ve been (and continue to be) very critical of CKK and his team particularly this season and it’s been deserved. But I’m likewise not going to ignore improvements when they’re clearly presenting themselves, which they have the last few games (I don’t count the cheapies against the Podunk States). Moreover, this program’s best outcome is CKK and his staff continuing its current trajectory, winning conf games, making the Trny, and putting itself in position to return a strong team along with a significant portal upgrade (or two). Ultimately CKK showing he is the right person to lead the program forward. Another round of a coaching search and complete reset is a VERY risky path forward for UNLV. We’ve had a string of failures and dumping CKK would confirm yet another. Echoing @dcut03, short of having a strong replacement with D1 coaching experience waiting in the wings we need CKK to make significant steps forward this season. Now, if he doesn’t do that, yes a new coach is fair game imo.We all here think he wasn't truly seasoned enough to get the job.
But the flip side of that coin is that his ceiling is actually potentially higher.
It was inevitable that he would make mistakes. And he certainly has. But if we jeep up this play and finish in the top 4 of a league that will get 4 or 5 in the dance, that is something.
I'm not saying that he is the savior or anything, I'm just saying that I think he can earn at the very least another year of his job with a strong finish and the best conference finish we have had in nearly a decade. Even if those early mistakes cost him an at large bid.
He does have a solid class coming in next year and has done well with the portal. A strong finish to this season should give him another year.
Unless you have a sure fire seasoned hit waiting in the wings. But that is very very unlikely.
It could definitely impact recruits and concerns me as well. As for the players they’ve kinda made their own bed. If they want fans to come back, keep winning games (and don’t lose to quad 4 teams).As small as the crowds have been at games, I wonder how much of an impact that will have with the current players and future recruits no matter what the outcome of the season is for CKK?
It’s difficult when you can’t bring a recruit on an official visit and have it be an exciting atmosphere. I mean, that’s gotta be seriously difficult. I remember fans swarming certain players for autographs, pulling them into the student section and just a great college atmosphere. Now it’s essentially a chilly morgue. And I don’t know how you get around that as a staff aside from scheduling them during top games (SDSU is pretty much it) to minimize the typical deadness in the arena.As small as the crowds have been at games, I wonder how much of an impact that will have with the current players and future recruits no matter what the outcome of the season is for CKK?