Trial of the century..
2 Dead people, 1 right arm vaporized by assault rifle from 17 year old kid at a riot.
2 Dead people, 1 right arm vaporized by assault rifle from 17 year old kid at a riot.
OT: Kyle Rittenhouse..guilty,not guilty or hung jury?
- Thread starter RebelScrub
- Start date
Considering he didn't have the gun illegally, came for the intention of helping a group of friends defend a car lot being burned down, and it was a mentally deranged serial child rapist who instigated the conflict in the first place.
I'm gonna go with....not guilty
I'm gonna go with....not guilty
It was a free pass to rape, murder, rob, arson, etc. , for the mob, and they decided to make an example of someone who was legally trying to defend the property of others and himself when that same mob openly attacked him. No way in hell should this ever have gone to trial.
Based on the number of messed up things with this trial, including the jurors being followed by reporters, modified evidence being submitted by the prosecutor, and the long delays, I'm guessing that it will either be a hung jury, or it will be changed to a mistrial with no verdict given.
Curious, has anyone watched the entire trial or do you guys get your cliff notes off CNN, MSNBC, TYT, social media?
This is the craziest trial of all time. BLM outside, Antifa, you got a knucklehead assault rifle guy with a mega horn being escorted by cops off property.
I watched most of the trial on YouTube at 1.5 speed.
Dude, things can pop off at anytime once the jury verdict is read.
The judge cracks me up. Playing Jeopardy! with the jury to pass the time and then Shirley Jackson style “Lottery”, let’s Kyle remove some jurors via Bingo bin.
The disinformation from News Media has been entirely different from what I saw in court.
This is the craziest trial of all time. BLM outside, Antifa, you got a knucklehead assault rifle guy with a mega horn being escorted by cops off property.
I watched most of the trial on YouTube at 1.5 speed.
Dude, things can pop off at anytime once the jury verdict is read.
The judge cracks me up. Playing Jeopardy! with the jury to pass the time and then Shirley Jackson style “Lottery”, let’s Kyle remove some jurors via Bingo bin.
The disinformation from News Media has been entirely different from what I saw in court.
So, in the spirit of full disclosure I'm a little left of center politically these days, which on Rebel-net makes me essentially Che Guevara when you distribute political takes. I'm pretty staunchly pro 2nd amendment though. I don't mind being in the big minority, but I usually keep my political takes to myself.
I think that this is an excellent case to determine if your left/liberal friends are acting in good faith when you talk about this case. No evidence I've seen convinced me that this wasn't a case of self-defense. Honestly, the only reason this one went to trial is because of the court of public opinion, because the prosecution literally had nothing that was going to stick. Star witness with a gunshot wound torpedoes your case and you put him on the stand, you bring up his video game history and try to go after his right to remain silent?
I think that the 2nd and 3rd gunshot victims probably thought they were trying to apprehend someone that murdered someone. I understand why they did what they did too. This is a case of bad news being followed by more good intentioned bad news.
I think this is only take to have.
I think that this is an excellent case to determine if your left/liberal friends are acting in good faith when you talk about this case. No evidence I've seen convinced me that this wasn't a case of self-defense. Honestly, the only reason this one went to trial is because of the court of public opinion, because the prosecution literally had nothing that was going to stick. Star witness with a gunshot wound torpedoes your case and you put him on the stand, you bring up his video game history and try to go after his right to remain silent?
I think that the 2nd and 3rd gunshot victims probably thought they were trying to apprehend someone that murdered someone. I understand why they did what they did too. This is a case of bad news being followed by more good intentioned bad news.
I think this is only take to have.
Majority of people are right/left of center.
Unfortunately social media has had the opposite effect of what it should have.
Should have created an a place for dialogue and discourse about differing ideas.
(We are similiar in that I'm left on most social issues namely criminal justice reform and immigration. But fiscally conservative and pro 2A.)
Anyway, instead what we see is people retreat into bubbles with other people who think the same way they do. In turn it creates an echo chamber. Makes people feel good because 'everybody agrees with me here! I must be right!
The correct verdict was made. Period end of story.
When the star witness for the prosecution said 'He only shot after I pointed my gun at him' this trial was over.
There was video. It's been out there for months.
Maybe this time around people have learned riots are not a free pass to attack people in their cars, in their business, or at their homes with a free pass being provided and the belief that it is illegal for the victims to defend themselves!
How did the DA decide to go through with charges?! He did interview the witnesses before deciding to prosecute right?
