Waiver approved finishing essay for admission to grad school, hopefully add on Friday looking like a reality a little late but still will add some depth and experience to the OL.
Boyko did not play as well his senior year as he did his sophomore and junior years. Evidence would be he was moved from LT to OG for I think the last four games. You don't move your best offensive linemen out of arguably the most important spot LT if he is playing well. No doubt Decker had some bad games, but he was under duress a lot last season and took a lot of hits. It would be one thing if he was a statue like a Drew Bledsoe and couldn't move in the pocket, but Decker is a pretty mobile guy. Add to that Jefferson leaving, which caused a lot of uncertainty and shuffling along the line. Then you have Davis missing half the season with injury. It seemed like anybody not named Devante or Devonte couldn't create separation. Plus the graduation of Tim Cornett hurt as well. Teams didn't fear the run as much last year and could pin their ears back and come after the passer.Ask yourself this question. How does the O line go from an outstanding bowl year of solid play and considered one of the top lines in the league to the perceived off year last? Answer:
The guy under center was erratic. If Decker hasn't matured fast we could be in for a roller coaster ride. This O line definitely needs to prove itself and fast! No where to hide.
I only have suspicions based on @rebelx above information so you could derive the individual for yourself.So can we officially say who this new OL is yet? Did I miss it somewhere? I saw speculations but no definite.
My guess is Matt Hegarty from Notre Dame. I just wonder if Ronnie Stanley hooked him up with coach Sanchez since they were teammates.
Decker did not trust his offensive line and ran out of protection packages at ill advised times . He made his line look bad at times and it was a point of contention amongst the o line. Boyko was moved to shore up the inside and to give saxelsid a chance to play because they he was whining. Jefferson was over rated and was no way the best lineman. Actually I thought they were pretty equal from right to left. Jefferson btw was just cut by the Bears . Boyko got most of the hype being senior but did suffer a couple injuries but I agree did not play as well as junior year. Not having Cornett did hurt I agree.Boyko did not play as well his senior year as he did his sophomore and junior years. Evidence would be he was moved from LT to OG for I think the last four games. You don't move your best offensive linemen out of arguably the most important spot LT if he is playing well. No doubt Decker had some bad games, but he was under duress a lot last season and took a lot of hits. It would be one thing if he was a statue like a Drew Bledsoe and couldn't move in the pocket, but Decker is a pretty mobile guy. Add to that Jefferson leaving, which caused a lot of uncertainty and shuffling along the line. Then you have Davis missing half the season with injury. It seemed like anybody not named Devante or Devonte couldn't create separation. Plus the graduation of Tim Cornett hurt as well. Teams didn't fear the run as much last year and could pin their ears back and come after the passer.
Really it's a chicken or the egg scenario. Did the Oline play poorly creating erratic play from Decker or did Decker's poor play make the OLine look worse than it actually was.
Interesting comments about Jefferson. Appreciate your point of view. Sounds like you know the team a little. Good to have to posting.D
Decker did not trust his offensive line and ran out of protection packages at ill advised times . He made his line look bad at times and it was a point of contention amongst the o line. Boyko was moved to shore up the inside and to give saxelsid a chance to play because they he was whining. Jefferson was over rated and was no way the best lineman. Actually I thought they were pretty equal from right to left. Jefferson btw was just cut by the Bears . Boyko got most of the hype being senior but did suffer a couple injuries but I agree did not play as well as junior year. Not having Cornett did hurt I agree.
I agree, I am not a proponent of how the star system and the grades are formulated. A kid being looked at and offered by UNLV may get 2 stars. Suddenly Arizona and another Pac-12 school show interest and the same kid gets another star. Metely referenced it to give people some more background on a new addition to the team.Those stars usually don't mean jack! That stuff is half political. If you are a top 50 player, that is usually significant because you been scrutinized by a lot of different eye balls. There r some 2 stars that should have been 3 and some 3s that should of been 2 or even 1.
The only kids that get rated are the ones who the scouts have seen. So if you aren't in a large metropolitan area chances are you aren't going to be on any ones radar. My son was rated a two star because he was seen at a Nike camp by some of the guys from Scout and Rivals. That was the only time they ever saw him. I was told by one of the guys if he lived in Seattle he would have been rated a lot higher. No one is going to drive to a little podunk town with a high school of 400 students to see a football game. So a lot of kids get overlooked because of that unless they get themselves exposure otherwise.Those stars usually don't mean jack! That stuff is half political. If you are a top 50 player, that is usually significant because you been scrutinized by a lot of different eye balls. There r some 2 stars that should have been 3 and some 3s that should of been 2 or even 1.
I have said this many times: Hauck's undoing was from a radical change in philosophy from one year to the next. He had successful year running the ball and sticking with the run and with Cornett and Bradley maturing along with the lineman he recruited we went to a bowl the next year those same lineman that were used to run blocking were asked to pass block in a pass happy spread quick tempo offense. They were all very ineffective in that scheme.Ask yourself this question. How does the O line go from an outstanding bowl year of solid play and considered one of the top lines in the league to the perceived off year last? Answer:
The guy under center was erratic. If Decker hasn't matured fast we could be in for a roller coaster ride. This O line definitely needs to prove itself and fast! No where to hide.
I have said this many times: Hauck's undoing was from a radical change in philosophy from one year to the next. He had successful year running the ball and sticking with the run and with Cornett and Bradley maturing along with the lineman he recruited we went to a bowl the next year those same lineman that were used to run blocking were asked to pass block in a pass happy spread quick tempo offense. They were all very ineffective in that scheme.
Will bottom line my friend the offensive line that he recruited was run oriented and they had played that way for four years and when they were seniors they went from run technique to pass technique and were very ineffective. Your not the only one who has played and knows football.Going from a 6'0 210 back with 4.48 speed to a 5'9 180 with a lot less speed forces a change in philosophy. You are only as good as the talent you field and last season's team wasn't going to pound it out and expect to be in a game.
Of course he had a lot to do with the wins, that's not my topic. I'm trying to explain why an offensive line that was a strength the previous years went backwards/regressed their senior year. I'm saying we were a running team you fire out it's a different mentality Hauck preached it they had success. Hauck's last year they went to the spread, pass oriented first step for a lineman is backwards huge difference mentality wise and technique. Shaq Murray Lawrence maybe no Cornett but he was quality. If I'm going to get fired I'm going out playing to the strength of the guys that got me a bowl game and road wins not Tim Rosenbach's spead offense.Caleb Herring deserves a lot of the credit for the 2013 season. His scrambling and decision-making bailed the team out on a lot of plays.
Will bottom line my friend the offensive line that he recruited was run oriented and they had played that way for four years and when they were seniors they went from run technique to pass technique and were very ineffective. Your not the only one who has played and knows football.
Read my above statement it was a simple statement of why I thought the offensive line regressed and I thought Hauck didn't remain true to himself. Nothing more than a personal observation.They team attempted 38 passes per game last year,37.2 in 2013 and 36 in 2012.
They 22.4 in 2011 and 27.1 in 2010 prior to that
I think the goal was always to be balanced and move the ball through the air