I think we will get them again.If I remember correctly we beat UNM at the Pit and it did little to affect the season!
This could happen making the next two months mighty interesting!I think we will get them again.
This is what I’m talking about with the MWC top teams. Solid, not great, don’t care if there’s a ranking there or not. CSU, don’t buy it. Don’t buy USU either. I’m not saying we will win, but there’s nothing “oh no” about any of these teams, even SDSU.
I think the chase for the top couple of spots will be ultra tight this year, probably more than any other. I think everyone is going to beat everyone, none of these 2 loss conference winners. I can see a real logjam. I just want to make it into the top 5.
I believe if he get's to the the NCAA's he stays. If not he go's. So 1 game is a start but a small one.Does the heat under Kevin’s seat get a little cooler?
absolutely NOTDoes the heat under Kevin’s seat get a little cooler?
UNM is similar to us last year, imo. I think we will see a couple conference teams like that, revealed as pretenders within the first few weeks of conference play. Gaudy OOC record and good metrics and they fall back to earth in conference.absolutely NOT
We just match up well against UNM - We will lose a lot of games in the near future in conference - The seat will only get hotter before you know it
100%. It seems to have plagued the program since Rice. Coaching issue imho.Games vs these top few teams are not the ones that decided Kevin's fate. I want to see what happens when we play like Fresno or SJSU and we come out flat and lose a game we absolutely shouldnt in embarrassing fashion. Its seems easy for our bigger named players to show up vs the bigger named top tier schools, but we always seem to drop mentally the game we shouldnt and thats the thing that keeps us from March and the tournament.
What is a surprise is to see 3 MWC teams ranked in the top 25 at the same time. After the game verse New Mexico, I look over their record and couldn't find a strong win in their record. Did they play any top 40 teams with the exception of CSU who they lost to a week ago?I think we will get them again.
This is what I’m talking about with the MWC top teams. Solid, not great, don’t care if there’s a ranking there or not. CSU, don’t buy it. Don’t buy USU either. I’m not saying we will win, but there’s nothing “oh no” about any of these teams, even SDSU.
I think the chase for the top couple of spots will be ultra tight this year, probably more than any other. I think everyone is going to beat everyone, none of these 2 loss conference winners. I can see a real logjam. I just want to make it into the top 5.
Yet their fans celebrate it. It’s wild how insane those Lobo fans are.If UNLV finishes in the top 4 in conference his seat should get significantly cooler. Does that guarantee him staying? Nope. But that kind of finish could get us at least in the NIT conversation. Top 2 or 3 could even punch a ticket to the big dance.
We match up well with UNM just as we match up poorly with SDSU.
Considering UNM was 12-1 OOC and had NO quad 1 or 2 wins says something to their schedule. And they were just as bad last season. St mary's was their onyl quad 1 or 2 game and they lost.
Rebel Net would break the internet if that happened here.
Exhibit A - SouthernGames vs these top few teams are not the ones that decided Kevin's fate. I want to see what happens when we play like Fresno or SJSU and we come out flat and lose a game we absolutely shouldnt in embarrassing fashion. Its seems easy for our bigger named players to show up vs the bigger named top tier schools, but we always seem to drop mentally the game we shouldnt and thats the thing that keeps us from March and the tournament.
Note UCLz (hate them so much I never put the A in there), lost to cal state Northridge this year and pulled out a close win over riverside. Would you call Cronin a bad coach as he lost to some cupcakes? I would not.Exhibit A - Southern
Exhibit B - Loyola Marymount
It’s funny how a final four and two sweet sixteens in your first three years buys you more rope than no post seasons and a 500 record buys you.Note UCLz (hate them so much I never put the A in there), lost to cal state Northridge this year and pulled out a close win over riverside. Would you call Cronin a bad coach as he lost to some cupcakes? I would not.
I get that CKK teams offenses and rebounding have always sucked, and he has recruited many poor players, and ran off a couple players who were good. I would look at that more than look at 2 bad losses.
It didnt buy Alford much time at UCLA and it wont buy Cronin much either. At UCLA you are supposed to have back to back undefeated seasons and win the Natty 75% of the time.It’s funny how a final four and two sweet sixteens in your first three years buys you more rope than no post seasons and a 500 record buys you.
And I thought UNLV fans lived in the past!It didnt buy Alford much time at UCLA and it wont buy Cronin much either. At UCLA you are supposed to have back to back undefeated seasons and win the Natty 75% of the time.
But it’s going to buy a hell of a lot more time than playing 500 ball, no? If Cronin gave us what he gave UCLA in his first three years there, Rebel fans would be giddy and being where we are at this season, he’d get a free pass from the fans, not a hotseat. It’s not like Southern and LMU are the only bad losses, let’s not rewrite history to make it sound like this is the only year with bad losses and the only year with struggles.It didnt buy Alford much time at UCLA and it wont buy Cronin much either. At UCLA you are supposed to have back to back undefeated seasons and win the Natty 75% of the time.
I'm not disagreeing with this part, either. Maybe this happening to him annually, as well as the many "bad losses" that have occurred on his watch, are why he's lost the confidence of many of us fans, even those who have been diehards throughout the years.I get that CKK teams offenses and rebounding have always sucked, and he has recruited many poor players, and ran off a couple players who were good. I would look at that more than look at 2 bad losses.
I dont know. How long did Alford last? 5 seasons with 3 sweet 16's to be exact.But it’s going to buy a hell of a lot more time than playing 500 ball, no? If Cronin gave us what he gave UCLA in his first three years there, Rebel fans would be giddy and being where we are at this season, he’d get a free pass from the fans, not a hotseat. It’s not like Southern and LMU are the only bad losses, let’s not rewrite history to make it sound like this is the only year with bad losses and the only year with struggles.
John Scherer flew here for an interview but UNLV scoffed at him. I would take Scherer long before I would consider Hurley and Alford.In hindsight we should have swallowed our pride and disgust with Alford and hired him many hirings ago (I can’t remember anymore when that was exactly). The program would have been much better off and I suspect we’d have parted ways after 4-5 years and few Trny runs.