Menzies inherited a dumpster fire. This season was better than the last. As long as we see improvements things are good. He built nmsu he can rebuild us.
I think the way the players are coddled in high school and AAU make majority of the players weak minded. You can’t teach heart and toughness.I'm not optimistic. He recruits the same weak minded players Rice did. We need tough players that understand the MWC grind.
I'm not optimistic. He recruits the same weak minded players Rice did. We need tough players that understand the MWC grind.
Winning their conference and making ncaa tournamentsBuilt NMSU to what exactly?
I'll take it!Winning their conference and making ncaa tournaments
I'll take it!
I'll take it!
NMSU is not nationally relevant. They played in an even weaker conference than the MWC and he never won a tournament game. Menzies has proven that he can do pretty well against really horrible teams. Consistently. That’s about it.
Fact is, expectations were rightfully low for this season and the team didn’t even meet those. Regardless of what he inherited, he should have done better with the talent and schedule he had. I just don’t know how anyone can say objectively that this season was a success under any metric, save that it was slightly better than the worse season ever.
I’m willing to give him more time. The jury is certainly still out. But he now has two seasons under his belt that were worse than expected when the seasons started. And both seasons may have had some of the lowest expectations ever. That is not the right direction.
I want nothing more than for him to make me look foolish next year and beyond.
NMSU is not nationally relevant. They played in an even weaker conference than the MWC and he never won a tournament game. Menzies has proven that he can do pretty well against really horrible teams. Consistently. That’s about it.
Fact is, expectations were rightfully low for this season and the team didn’t even meet those. Regardless of what he inherited, he should have done better with the talent and schedule he had. I just don’t know how anyone can say objectively that this season was a success under any metric, save that it was slightly better than the worse season ever.
I’m willing to give him more time. The jury is certainly still out. But he now has two seasons under his belt that were worse than expected when the seasons started. And both seasons may have had some of the lowest expectations ever. That is not the right direction.
I want nothing more than for him to make me look foolish next year and beyond.
I didnt say he made nmsu nationally relevant. I said he built the program, left it better than it was. And if he can do that there he can do bigger things here.NMSU is not nationally relevant. They played in an even weaker conference than the MWC and he never won a tournament game. Menzies has proven that he can do pretty well against really horrible teams. Consistently. That’s about it.
Fact is, expectations were rightfully low for this season and the team didn’t even meet those. Regardless of what he inherited, he should have done better with the talent and schedule he had. I just don’t know how anyone can say objectively that this season was a success under any metric, save that it was slightly better than the worse season ever.
I’m willing to give him more time. The jury is certainly still out. But he now has two seasons under his belt that were worse than expected when the seasons started. And both seasons may have had some of the lowest expectations ever. That is not the right direction.
I want nothing more than for him to make me look foolish next year and beyond.
I’m with you. No matter what Universe I try to place myself in, there’s absolutely no way I can come up with “good job”. That’s not saying fire the guy. But no, a good job wasn’t done. For the second year in a row, the team was “lost” at the end of the season, gave up, tired out, lost interest, whatever. Losing 6 of the last 7? Come on now. Winning only 20 games with a very poor schedule, 13 or 14 of those wins came against teams that finished 500 or below.... those are freebies. Losing by 38 and 25... please. Swept by Utah State. Hard to call any of that good.And this conversation is strong evidence of one reason why the fans have abandoned ship. If it is unreasonable to expect even a 6th place finish in a crappy conference with 2 senior guards, 2 highly decorated Juco players, and a possible first-round NBA big, what is the point of showing up? When even hopes of mediocrity are swatted away as delusional, bigger problems are afoot.
That's the toughest part. In my 30 plus years of watching UNLV basketball up close, I've never had lower expectations. And that they can't be met .... it's sad.Yep. By these new metrics, Hue Jackson would be doing a good job if the Browns won one game next year.
True. But making the tournament with a program like NMSU may be easier too. In the last 12 years the’ve made it 8 times with 4 different coaches.Winning a tournament game with a program like NMSU is much more difficult than accomplishing it with a lot of other programs. I don’t think that’s a big deal.
True. But making the tournament with a program like NMSU may be easier too. In the last 12 years the’ve made it 8 times with 4 different coaches.
FWIW the results for Dave Rice were much different if you look at years 1 and 2 and compare them to the results in the next 3 years. After year 2 it looked like Rice would do much better than he did.
Going up from worst season in the history of the school isn’t hard to do. I don’t know you, but you could have managed that. Tina herself could have.I've talked about this in the past as well. In Rice's first 2 years, playing with LK's recruits, he went 51-19 (19-11 MW) and made the tourney twice, in years 3-5, he went 47-35 (18-21 MW) and didn't make any postseason apps.
Lon Kruger was 34-27 (17-13 MW) in his first 2 years with one NIT app, but 78-26 (33-15 MW) in years 3-5 with 2 NCAA apps including a S16 and 2nd rd loss, plus an NIT app. 49-18 (22-10 MW) in his 6th and 7th years with 2 more NCAA apps.
Menzies #'s so far. 31-34 (12-24 MW) in his first 2 years, no postseason.
Lon Kruger started on the hill and kept going up, he may have hit a valley or two, but it was mostly an upward trend. Rice started near the top of the hill, went up higher, but then started going downhill fast and couldn't seem to stop the avalanche. Menzies on the other hand started at the bottom of the hill and so far has slowly made his way up, but at least he's still going up.
Going up from worst season in the history of the school isn’t hard to do. I don’t know you, but you could have managed that. Tina herself could have.
If next year is the same? Or worse?
If it’s worse/same but fans are showing, I think he will be ok. If it’s same/better but nobody pays attention, my bet is UNLV makes a move.
Can’t keep losing money at this rate.
Agreed. I think it’s attendance driven as much as anything because we are at an extreme with attendance. Unfortunately, because of the heavy apathy, if the Rebels actually do ok, do what’s generally considered “acceptable”, I fear crowds will still be tiny. There’s a lot of reasons behind that, I think. Jaded fans from the recent bs, jaded fans from the long term bs, fans in general becoming shorter, the Knights and other competition. UNLV lost the small hold they had over the city. Yeah, the diehards, the ones that have been showing, they’ll still show. But it’s too small of a number to maintain anything.I was just about to say something about that. If you look at our last 3 coaches that were here for more than 3 years, year 3 seemed to be a turning point. Bayno made his first NCAA tourney in year 3 and made it again in year 5, which was also our last MW regular season title. Kruger made his first NCAA tourney (at UNLV) in year 3 and preceded to lead UNLV to the dance in 4 of the next 5 years. Rice was the opposite though, year 3 was when things started falling apart and just kept getting worse and more frustrating. I know I talk a lot about 'year 3', but looking at a lot of other coaches that have success, more often than not year 3 seems to be when it either happens or doesn't. There's obviously exceptions like Muss and Beard, and a few others, even some that took longer, but if our past repeats itself then next year could tell a lot.
I agree with you Joe that if next years results are the same/little better/little worse, but the attendance still sucks, UNLV will pull the plug on the MM experience.
And part of that is politics, too. The AD that hires you is more likely to ride it out because you were their hire. A new AD, at some point, is going to want to make their mark.Agreed. I think it’s attendance driven as much as anything because we are at an extreme with attendance. Unfortunately, because of the heavy apathy, if the Rebels actually do ok, do what’s generally considered “acceptable”, I fear crowds will still be tiny. There’s a lot of reasons behind that, I think. Jaded fans from the recent bs, jaded fans from the long term bs, fans in general becoming shorter, the Knights and other competition. UNLV lost the small hold they had over the city. Yeah, the diehards, the ones that have been showing, they’ll still show. But it’s too small of a number to maintain anything.
It sucks, but I think UNLV needs to do really well in order for the crowds are going to be ok. That means even a fluke MWCT win isn’t going to help. There’s zero hype heading into next season too... fans won’t be there early. Can’t play 5 bums and go 5-0 and expect people to show up... they won’t, last year showed that. Look at last year’s 11-2. I don’t envy MM’s position. I think it’s really tough.
I don’t have the answers. I think we need to do very well in the Diamondhead Classic. I think we need to beat a couple of name teams early.