ADVERTISEMENT

Dept of Education ruling (NIL/Revenue sharing)

LVRebel2000

Rebel Legend
Gold Member
Jun 30, 2011
5,912
3,896
513
Las Vegas

Pretty interesting read. It sounds like they're making schools account for title IX equally, meaning the same allocation for women as men.
 
thats not going to make the Big schools happy....
Wow I could imagine that won't make many football players that transferred to Purdue happy. That could cut their profit share income in half. A women's track athlete
could earn more per year than some of her professors!? Will women's basketball players earn more profit share than men's football players?
 
Wow I could imagine that won't make many football players that transferred to Purdue happy. That could cut their profit share income in half. A women's track athlete
could earn more per year than some of her professors!? Will women's basketball players earn more profit share than men's football players?
In order to balance the $ amounts certainly would seem so. How else do you take 104 scholarship players earning shares and provide equal sharing to the womens programs.
 
In order to balance the $ amounts certainly would seem so. How else do you take 104 scholarship players earning shares and provide equal sharing to the womens programs.
I was thinking exactly the same thing. If they can control allocation within women's sports, they will share more with the most profitable womens sports. In Utah, that would be womens basketball, gymnastics and maybe volleyball. Women with basketball profit shares in college may earn as much or more than the pros. This could also create situations where some P4 programs will chose to not use all 104 football scholarships, due to Title X pressures and also pressures from players wishing to earn more and not dilute their profit shares.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
I was thinking exactly the same thing. If they can control allocation within women's sports, they will share more with the most profitable womens sports. In Utah, that would be womens basketball, gymnastics and maybe volleyball. Women with basketball profit shares in college may earn as much or more than the pros. This could also create situations where some P4 programs will chose to not use all 104 football scholarships, due to Title X pressures and also pressures from players wishing to earn more and not dilute their profit shares.
Correct me if I'm wrong, its not just the individual sports revenue, its the departments revenue as a whole that is shared capped at 20 million? So 10 million has to go to the women's sports?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
Correct me if I'm wrong, its not just the individual sports revenue, its the departments revenue as a whole that is shared capped at 20 million? So 10 million has to go to the women's sports?
I do not know the answer to your questions and I don't have time to research this. Someone that knows please share your thoughts . I was raising possibilities that could lead to unexpected side effects that will dramatically change certain directions for all of college sports. An earthquake. I just imagine some schools not increasing or even reducing the number of men's football scholarships after this plays out and/or killing off variety of nonprofitable men's sports teams outside of football and basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
If all athletes have to get the same, that’s gonna be really interesting. The P4 has 1100 athletes per program. 20,000,000÷1100 is $18,000 athlete. Way more fuel for the P4 to separate itself from the NCAA.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
The simple fact is the minute they allow school funds to be used, then they are going to make it equal, so the easy way is to leave it with the boosters and let them just go wild like they are doing now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
Without reading anything, a loophole and honestly a fair way to look at this is revenue sharing is broken down by individual sport revenue generation.
Football generates the most, probably followed by men's basketball then perhaps women's basketball or baseball depending on the school.
Even if media revenue is shared partially they could break down ticket sales NCAA individual sport championship sharing etc to slide the scales towards the money sports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
Without reading anything, a loophole and honestly a fair way to look at this is revenue sharing is broken down by individual sport revenue generation.
Football generates the most, probably followed by men's basketball then perhaps women's basketball or baseball depending on the school.
Even if media revenue is shared partially they could break down ticket sales NCAA individual sport championship sharing etc to slide the scales towards the money sports.
Simple fact is that 95% of athletic programs lose a lot of money, how can they talk revenue sharing when the revenue doesn't even come close to covering the scholarship expense let alone any profit.
 
The simple fact is the minute they allow school funds to be used, then they are going to make it equal, so the easy way is to leave it with the boosters and let them just go wild like they are doing now.
Thought I read that department of education is saying even if the money comes from a collective, title IX will still apply. Schools are still responsible for this money going to players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LVRebel2000
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT