And UNLV is doing a good job on him. That’s why it’s tight.Csu has 1 good player. One decent. The others is just purely system driven
Fire whom? If you are talking about Kruger, you know they are not going to do anything until the last game of the season is over!GOOD LORD FIRE THIS ASS CLOWN
I think these are a few good prop bets for UNLV for next season:And UNLV is doing a good job on him. That’s why it’s tight.
They are system driven, so is BSU, AFA, and USU. UNM is more by way of talent, that’s what UNLV and SDSU try to do as well, more reliant on individual ability.
You’re fired, too.Fire whom? If you are talking about Kruger, you know they are not going to do anything until the last game of the season is over!
I hate “record” as a measurement because there are different strengths and they can vary wildly. 17, 18, 19 wins with a super tough schedule is better than 20 with a moderate schedule or 22 with a Marv schedule.I think these are a few good prop bets for UNLV for next season:
1) They will have a new basketball coach.
2) They will finish with a better record than this year.
3) The new coach will not be a past UNLV player.
Does anyone else have prop bets for next season?
Personally, I don't see that even being an issue. Four seasons of little more than ineptitude far outweighs bad performances by 3-4 opponents in a conference tournament. And make no mistake, this team isn't good enough to beat top 5 teams in this league (even if it's not good) without those teams playing poorly.That can be awful if the team goes on a miracle run in the conference tournament.
The way I see it Menzies was better in performance. I think conference wins is one of the best measures of a coaches performance. You can mess with OOC, but in conference is similar year to year.I hate “record” as a measurement because there are different strengths and they can vary wildly. 17, 18, 19 wins with a super tough schedule is better than 20 with a moderate schedule or 22 with a Marv schedule.
With this years, last years, year before schedule /conference, anything below 20 is failure.
It’s a really bad 4 year tenure, it rivals Menzies’ tenure, which was worse than even Rollies.
You sure you want to do that? I am in the running as a finalist for the new position as head coach for UNLV basketball when the position open up along with two other very worthy candidates. I am not suppose to let it out, but I have attached a short video of the other two finalist!You’re fired, too.
Menzies sucked as a coach, but his first year was self inflicted for the most part. Yes, he should have done better, but the searching hire/recruiting cycle, UNLV chasing away players … made for a tough first year. But I’m sure current Marv has been awful. He’s just not a good coach. Never has been.The way I see it Menzies was better in performance. I think conference wins is one of the best measures of a coaches performance. You can mess with OOC, but in conference is similar year to year.
Menzies Conference wins: Y1 - 4, Y2 - 8, Y3 - 11.
CKK Conference wins: Y1 - 10, Y2 - 7, Y3 - 12, Y4 - 8?
Menzies increased his wins - CKK up and down.
I’m not sure. I dont see a plan with KK. Menzies recruited better. Was awful at end of games, teams were one on one garbage/low structure, same with KK. It can work if you have two guys who are nba/fringe nba. If you have moderate talent it looks like 24 hour fitness hoops.Menzies was horrible. CKK is better than him. That is Not saying much. Menzies looked like he put as much effort into game planning as Biden did with the Border. With CKK atleast you can see something of a plan. Not much on offense ,but we dont get blown out as much as we did under him. Plus Menzies had better players.
Yes i agree.I’m not sure. I dont see a plan with KK. Menzies recruited better. Was awful at end of games, teams were one on one garbage/low structure, same with KK. It can work if you have two guys who are nba/fringe nba. If you have moderate talent it looks like 24 hour fitness hoops.