Twitter has some good insiders, but yeah, the way I look at it … if their primary motivation is clicks and likes and it’s very evident that’s their motivation … I’m reluctant to buy in, my default goes into grift and/or delusion and I know they’re tossing out tons of bullshit for views, occasional real info they steal from elsewhere, and an occasional piece of bullshit that hits with a fluke.
I remember way, way back, when we did the recruiting hot list … somebody tried one on their own, which is welcome, if you have info, you have info. But I’m absolutely positive everyone of those names was a personal wishlist player, but projected as a target … and unfortunately, “progress” was reported with their recruitment … and I’m 100 percent positive there was no contact whatsoever. Especially back then, the contacts for my info was as strong as it gets, like very accurate and to the moment. And when I checked on those other names, it was 100% nothing there and even “never heard of the guy”.
Sadly, those same types liked to steal the info and project it as their own independent info and disseminate elsewhere. But that’s common practice nowadays, I suppose. Anything for the love of anonymous internet strangers, I guess. That’s 180 degree opposed from me.
