Truth is we are going to be a stepping stone. It will take several coaches to get us ultimately where we want to be. One coach won't come in here and build it from scratch to the promise land. Unless we become p5 and can pay with the big boys any coach with any sort of success will ditch us for a better job.
So any coach will be best served making the best with the pieces he has inherited and getting success. Success will in turn help with recruiting, and help get a good replacement coach. Like a Boise State or even a SDSU.
Sanchez has recruited arguably better than every coach in the past 15 years. If he doesn't hit the mark next season and is let go, the new guy should try to work with the pieces he has, and not try to blow things up. Or "start from scratch".
Some times I wonder how much better the recruiting really has been.
'Highest ranked UNLV class ever'
108 nationally...
Is there really a huge difference between 108 and say 122?
Does it feel like it's a lot better because Sanchez has made it more than transparent than Hauck?
It seems like it's better. I think it is in overall depth, but in terms of impact/star guys. I'm not sure..
There will be some overlapping obviously. And if people want to argue Sanchez' coaches developed them that's fine. Probably fair to say in a number of cases. A lot of these guys will have played more under Sanchez than Hauck. But as far as bringing in/recruiting impact guys....I think it's closer than some might think.
QB
Herring/Sneed/Sherry/Decker
Vs
Rogers/Gilliam/Stanton/Palendech
The stars are better on Sanchez' group. Much more highly touted. Way more potential. But has that group been more productive or better than Hauck's. I'd say a little. A couple more wins overall. Roger's has the most potential. I would also say none have had as a good or as efficient of a season as Herring did his senior year though. (Herring may have been a Sanford guy that Hauck honored. Would have to check, if that is the case, then it's not really close) Potential definetly better with Sanchez' guys. Results as well, but not by all that much.
RB-
Lex over Cornett. Stats don't lie. Cornett was good Lex was better.
WR- Sanchez' group may be deeper but DeVante Davis and Boyd both Hauck guys are better than any Sanchez guys. I don't think it's really close here.
OL- Boyko. I think Sanchez' overall depth and talent is better, but has he landed a tackle or any other OL guy as good as Boyko was?
DL- Mike Hughes. You would have a hard time convincing me Sanchez has recruited a better player on the Dline than Mike Hughes.
LB- John Lotulelei. Two year Juco. From Hauck. Would you take any of Sanchez LBs over him?
DB- McTyer. Sanchez guy. I would say is arguably the best DB we've had here since Eric Wright.
Again, Sanchez has brought in better overall depth. I don't think there is any question.
But in terms of best guys, or most impactful guys, I don't think there is or has been a huge difference to this point yet.
Am I missing anybody from Hauck? Or Sanchez, that you or anybody would slot in there? This was off the top of my head..