So having an opinion, then stating that he believed that opinion and still think it was fair while also stating that he i seeing new things and improvements makes him "deserving some criticism?"
The team last year imploded at the end of the season. Players fought in the locker room after the last game... What would you call it? I can't put all of that on Rice, but the player that caused a lot of the issues was his recruit and it's his team, so he takes some heat for that.
I do agree with your point about the "mass exodus." Players left for a number of reasons. It's unsettling, but it's the way the college game is trending and, realistically, the only 2 that left that I'd have back are Birch and Roscoe. They both wanted to go pro and get paid while they improve; can't fault that. BDJ had to go; Deville couldn't hold down the point and didn't offer much; Morant still would have struggled to see the floor on this roster.
The trajectory argument is valid: From year 1-2 we went sideways (1st round NCAA losses); in year 3, we didn't even get an NIT bid. Even though its one year, it could be viewed as a cause for concern.
For the record, I have always been a Rice guy, from day one. I've seen improvement as far as his coaching and what he does each year. I think the fresh start with the roster turnover and a couple new coaches was exactly what he needed and, again, his coaching has taken another step up. Sean Miller is a GREAT coach, and Rice out-schemed, out-adjusted and out-coached him. Its a great sign and hopefully a springboard game for the rest of the year (and beyond).
All that being said, I don't sit back and pretend everything has been fantastic and he deserves no criticism, and I certainly won't call someone out for having an opinion or changing their opinion. Every game we play, there is new information to consider. So though I back Rice, and believe he is the right man for the job, he far is "far from not deserving any criticism."