Steve Alford gets canned and wants to come to UNLV. With him, we also get his son Bryce as a graduate transfer. Would you take this package?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet we win the conference and make a sweet 16 in the next three couple of years with him. I think he's way over his head at UCLA. I don't think they'll fire him but if he can't win with TJ Leaf and Alonzo Ball, he out.Yes.
I hate that cock sucker with every fiber of my being. But, he would win here.I bet we win the conference and make a sweet 16 in the next three couple of years with him. I think he's way over his head at UCLA. I don't think they'll fire him but if he can't win with TJ Leaf and Alonzo Ball, he out.
Ugh. No please. For me its just personal--I just can't stand that man.
I agree, but when I say the same thing about Pitino, I'm a hypocrite. Amusing.
No I came right out and said I don't like him and said why. I don't "hate" anyone I don't know. You need to reread the response that said exactly that. Again doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't like him because he will bring NCAA trouble with him. He caused the trouble because he is a cheater. Apparently you don't understand the difference.No. I'm just flat out saying I don't personally like Alford. I'm not trying to hide the fact that I just don't like him. You avoid (and even deny) saying that you just hate Pitino. Its your "cause he is a cheater" defence that makes you a hypocrite! If you just don't like him, that's fine!
No I came right out and said I don't like him and said why. I don't "hate" anyone I don't know. You need to reread the response that said exactly that. Again doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't like him because he will bring NCAA trouble with him. He caused the trouble because he is a cheater. Apparently you don't understand the difference.
No I came right out and said I don't like him and said why. I don't "hate" anyone I don't know. You need to reread the response that said exactly that. Again doesn't make me a hypocrite because I don't like him because he will bring NCAA trouble with him. He caused the trouble because he is a cheater. Apparently you don't understand the difference.
If you just flat out said you don't like him, then that's fine! That's your opinion. But, you try to rationalize the reason for not liking him by saying things like "he is a cheater" and "he will bring NCAA trouble with him". I'm just pointing out the fact the exact same thing was said about Tarkanian under very similar circumstances. Yet you adore one man and hate (oops... I mean really, really, dislike) the other--which is absolutely hypocritical!
You're not a hypocrite for just not liking him. You're a hypocrite for bashing one person and praising the other when their situations are/were very similar.
That take is probably more appropriate for Calipari who has had banners and wins stripped at two of his previous stops.
I would have to look it up again, (correct me if I am wrong) but as far as I know Pitino has not forfeited any wins or had banners removed from the rafters.
That could change with this current investigation. If Pitino knew what was happening, and he secured recruits 'illegally' then he may end up forfeiting wins during that time frame. In which case you could say he is a 'cheater'. That would make him a no in my book as well. Until then its speculative.
It is also speculation to say he would in fact bring NCAA heat here. It is impossible to make that assertion with 100% certainty.
Why chance it when there are other successful coaches not in the NCAA cross hairs?
it is all speculation, even the chance that Pitino is interested in the job. When Tark was hired after leaving Long Beach State the NCAA said their would be no further action taken against Tark or any actions taken against UNLV for hiring him, but then they came after him and UNLV. I am afraid the same thing might happen with Pitino. Why chance it when there are other successful coaches not in the NCAA cross hairs?
I'm curious. Who are these other "successful" coaches you speak of? Archie Miller I'm sure would be one of them. But, besides him, who else could be considered a successful coach and not an "up-and-coming assistant"?
I'm all for Archie Miller if not Pitino. But, I feel he's pretty secure at Dayton. In his eyes, the UNLV job would be nothing more than a lateral move. Unless, of course, we bump his salary enough that he becomes interested. But, would the boosters be united on Miller? I'm on the fence with that one.
The issue I think people have with your posts on this topic is that you are speaking in absolutes when there are none.
You say Pitino us a cheater..There hasn't been anything found yet to say he has.
You say Pitino will bring NCAA attention, when right now there is no way to say that with certainty.
Personally I think there is some risk with hiring Pitino. Not enough yet to say hiring him would be a mistake.
There are plenty of good coaches out there, very few with Pitino's resume.
I do not think Pitino will be our coach, I do however think UNLV will have a very good coach when this process is over.
The issue I think people have with your posts on this topic is that you are speaking in absolutes when there are none.
You say Pitino us a cheater..There hasn't been anything found yet to say he has.
You say Pitino will bring NCAA attention, when right now there is no way to say that with certainty.
Personally I think there is some risk with hiring Pitino. Not enough yet to say hiring him would be a mistake.
There are plenty of good coaches out there, very few with Pitino's resume.
I do not think Pitino will be our coach, I do however think UNLV will have a very good coach when this process is over.
I understand Bullmastif, nothing is absolute but I don't know that he is worth the risk. I agree that I believe President Jessup will find a high profile coach to help UNLV reach his goal of making UNLV a Tier 1 school.
The one thing we do know is the Pitino is one hell of a coach. I don't think anybody can deny that fact.
IMO, the pros outweight any cons in the hiring of Pitino. Sure, he comes with a risk (maybe a big risk, as some of your think), but his potential is ridiculous. There is no other coach available that could make a bigger impact at UNLV right now than Pitino. Take the safe route and hire an up-and-coming assistant, and it may take a few seasons before we see any improvement. Pitino could make UNLV an instant hit. I'm willing to take our chances.
I don't know anything about his kid other than he can shoot the rock. But his dad's a douche.
i'm going to guess anyone who would be okay with this hole being the coach hasn't been a fan for very long. i'm not saying any player who was on a team that beat the Rebels in a big game should be hated, not at all. a little disliked, sure. this anal fissure is beyond that. he's scum.Almost all of these big names we are mentioning have massive egos and have douche properties that they carry with them. Alford has a passion for winning as does Pitino. I would regrettably accept him just because he has proven that he changed players and coach teams into this conference.
Decent coach but terrrible fit for UNLV.I heard a new name being brought up on Steve Cofield's show. Pitts coach Jamie Dixon. I'm not that familiar with him, any thoughts?